For years the FBI has been following Hunter Biden. Reports have suggested that Biden is being investigated for money laundering as well as foreign connections. The DOJ is bringing witnesses to the grand jury lately, suggesting that this case could be close to completion. The latest report even indicated that the grand jury is asking questions about “the big guy” — who has been identified as Joe Biden.
Meanwhile, Joe Biden has continued to publicly claim his son didn’t do anything wrong, despite the facts that we already know. It’s increased the call for a special counsel to ensure the independence of the investigation, including from George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley.
So, Fox’s Peter Doocy asked White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki if there was any intention to appoint a special counsel to ensure the integrity of the investigation. Psaki tries to dodge the question by rearranging her appearance and directing it towards the Justice Department.
Peter Doocy questions Psaki about Biden’s support for a special counsel, to ensure the integrity of the investigation into Hunter Biden’s laptop. pic.twitter.com/78jRhhsvvt
— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) April 5, 2022
Doocy also asked about White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain’s comment that Biden is confident his son did not break the law. Psaki confirmed that was Biden’s position. The problem with comments such as these is that they can chill the investigation. That’s why you’re not supposed to make any such comments. And why even if Biden didn’t personally talk with anyone in the DOJ, he’s still not acting properly. In these circumstances, how is the DOJ to prosecute?
Doocy also pressed Psaki on what Biden knew of his son’s business dealings, and Psaki repeated Biden’s claim that he had never spoken to his son about his overseas business dealings.
DOOCY: The President claimed that he had never spoken to his son about overseas business transactions. Does that hold true today?
PSAKI: “Yes.” pic.twitter.com/HkoJU3CYKo
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) April 5, 2022
So, Biden knows Hunter is innocent, although he’s never discussed his dealings with him? As Jen Psaki believes Jen is honest, I also believe this.
I’m just curious. So, if they’ve never talked about his overseas dealings, who does Joe Biden think he’s posing with, in those pictures with Hunter’s business associates, including his Ukrainian, Kazakh, and Mexican associates? “Oh hey, Dad, these are just random guys I want you to take pictures with, including in the VP’s office”? What’s Joe Biden’s explanation for that?
Biden said he “never discussed” his son Hunter’s business dealings with him.
Here’s a picture of Joe Biden as VICE PRESIDENT hosting his son’s business associates in the vice president’s office. pic.twitter.com/QSgjxyRoPu
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 30, 2021
The photo, published by a Kazakhstani anti-corruption website, shows Joe Biden meeting Hunter’s alleged business partner from Kazakhstan https://t.co/5VYPUiwlSD via @nypost
— Daniel Chaitin (@danielchaitin7) October 20, 2020
— Jake (@highsteel433) April 5, 2022
What about the dinner that Joe had with Ukrainian, Russian, and Kazakh associates of Hunter’s, including Russian billionaire Elena Baturina, who allegedly gave one of Hunter’s firms $3.5 million? What’s Joe Biden’s explanation for that?
How about the explanation for what Tony Bobulinski — who used to work for the Bidens — said? He said that Joe was involved in Hunter’s business dealings, that the 10 percent for “the big guy” referenced Joe Biden. This should have done Biden in before the election, but liberal media didn’t press Biden on it. What’s Joe Biden’s explanation for that?
Tony Bobulinski: “I have heard Joe Biden say that he has never discussed business with Hunter. That is false… At my approximately hour-long meeting with Joe that night, we discussed… the Biden family’s business plans with the Chinese, with which he was plainly familiar.” pic.twitter.com/JBk0jx0f38
— Jerry Dunleavy (@JerryDunleavy) October 22, 2020
Biden also claimed that his son didn’t get any money related to China. It was shown to be a lie in documents that were presented to Senator Chuck Grassley on the Senate Floor last week, as well as what Bobulinski stated. What’s Joe Biden’s explanation for that?
You could continue on this for a while.
“I didn’t know anything” and/or “I’m going to avoid the question” are not acceptable answers.
About Post Author
