The Government and Big Pharma Should Be Prohibited From Calling Shots “Vaccines” – Opinion

A war erupted in Big Ice Cream several years back.  Although the product was labeled ice-cream, some manufacturers sold it to others in the market. However, the quality of the product did not meet industry standards.  Some manufacturers used cheaper ingredients in order to avoid the high cost of cream.  After much discussion, the FDA (yes, that FDA) issued a rule which defined what Ice Cream was and what could carry the name on the label, and what was later defined as “frozen dairy dessert.”  Why?  Well, because the latter just isn’t Ice Cream.

In 2020, the COVID-19 epidemic erupted. There was a rush to find a vaccine that would protect everyone. Through Operation Warp Speed, the Trump Administration created the largest mass-medical effort in our country’s history.  It cost Billions to make the rushed vaccine. Miles of bureaucratic red tape were eliminated in order to allow private firms to manufacture the product, which was widely regarded as the ultimate solution for COVID-19.  Three vaccines — Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson and Johnson — made their debut before Trump left office, handing over what was announced as highly effective vaccines. “Get vaccinated,” they said, “so we can all get back to normal.”

Although I admit that I got the vaccine myself early, it was mainly to protect my father who is octogenarian and whom I saw several times per week.  There was not yet any vaccine data at that point.  I believed the information provided by the drug companies that produced and approved the vaccines.  Because I was aware that the government could hold large pharma companies and governments accountable in the event that anyone in my family or I were injured by the vaccine, I decided to do my bit in times of crisis.

This was before the government and the big pharma were protected from any injury resulting from COVID vaccinations.

From NBC News

In February, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act. The 2005 law empowers the HHS secretary to provide legal protection to companies making or distributing critical medical supplies, such as vaccines and treatments, unless there’s “willful misconduct” by the company. Protection lasts up to 2024

That means that for the next four years, these companies “cannot be sued for money damages in court” over injuries related to the administration or use of products to treat or protect against Covid.

They are now trying to make us take a vaccination that we don’t have any recourse to if we get hurt, even though it has been more than one year.

However, I have to say that the order regarding immunity to lawsuits specifically mentions medical injuries and deaths resulting from the vaccination. This limits one’s recourse in case of injury.  There may be some recourse against the government and vaccine manufacturer for an even more serious, almost ice-cream-like reason.

What they are selling, aren’t vaccines.

While the FDA was free to determine what was and wasn’t ice cream based upon the definition of ice cream before the invention and discovery of replacement “frozen dairy dessert” ingredients, so should we be able to determine what a vaccine was, before the powers that be hastily changed the definition to meet the failures of the COVID-19 vaccines.  My colleague and friend over at PJ Media, Stephen Kruiser, took this on just the other day when he said: “Stop Calling It A Vaccine.”

Because vaccines these aren’t.  The vaccines are believed to have prevented nearly all of humanity from getting infected by the pathogen they were supposed to protect them from.  You were guaranteed protection against measles and mumps if you had been vaccinated.  They weren’t there to give you a mild case of polio or turn measles into a seasonal threat.  They were designed to eradicate the disease.  People rushed to get vaccined and all children in the United States are now scheduled for vaccination.  I got vaccinated based upon the promises from the drug manufacturers and the government: That if I got the shot, I wouldn’t get COVID.

Those promises have fallen flat, with them now suggesting that the vaccines may not even reduce your chances of being hospitalized and dying from COVID-19, only that the vaccines *may* reduce your chances of hospitalization and death.  For a disease which has a survival rate of well over 95% for those who are not vaccinated (under 70), all this is unacceptable.  Worse, Omicron is being portrayed by the government as a disease. They claim the vaccines have reduced hospitalizations and deaths. Yet, when you analyze the data from less vaccinated populations, like South Africa, you’ll find that the reduced severity is linked to the variant itself and not to the vaccines or any effect they may have.

So while the government and drug manufacturers continue to push, through publicly funded commercials, press conferences, mailers, mandates, and narratives, they already know… they know beyond a reasonable doubt… that what they are saying is untrue.  This is fraud advertising.  The term vaccine is like ice-cream in that it has a precise and well-known definition.   I stand a very good chance of never getting infected with any other disease when I get vaccinated.  Not only should the government and not-a-vaccine manufacturers stop using the term “vaccine” to describe the COVID-19 shots, but they should also be legally prohibited from using the term by the courts.   False advertising is made by using that term.