Tueday, it became evident that the Russian Army was abandoning territory in Ukraine that it seized shortly after Putin’s War began on February 24 (Russian Troops Retreat From Ukraine to Russia: Planned Redeployment or the Beginning of Collapse?). This withdrawal allowed Ukrainian forces to retake previously occupied territories from the north of Kharkiv, to the Russian border.
A week is a big difference. Russian positions from yesterday to the left, compared with those of a week earlier. h/t @Militarylandnet pic.twitter.com/5gVye2hQra
— streiff (@streiffredstate) May 10, 2022
There are solid, but not confirmed reports that Ukrainian troops crossed the border into Russia to the North-East Kharkiv. They were located near Ternova. The UAF General Staff today announced that Russian troops had withdrawn from the border. It seems that this unconfirmed information makes it more likely pic.twitter.com/UNt0aWChQi
— Nathan Ruser (@Nrg8000) May 10, 2022
Today’s news is solid, even though it was not confirmed last night.
A New York Times article attempted to make a story that differed from the one that can be seen in intelligence summaries or video.
The New York Times offering is Ukraine War’s Geographic Reality: Russia Has Seized Much of the East.
Russia’s nearly three-month-old invasion of neighboring Ukraine has been punctuated by flawed planning, poor intelligence, barbarity and wanton destruction. The fact that Russia made ground gains is often lost in all the fighting.
The Russian Defense Ministry said Tuesday that its forces in eastern Ukraine had advanced to the border between Donetsk and Luhansk, the two Russian-speaking provinces where Moscow-backed separatists have been fighting Ukraine’s army for eight years.
The ministry’s assertion, if confirmed, strengthens the prospect that Russia could soon gain complete control over the region, known as the Donbas, compared with just a third of it before the Feb. 24 invasion.
I’m not going to take the time to “fisk” this line by line but there are three points to be made. First, Russia lost the majority of territory it seized in Ukraine during its initial invasion. Second. It controls more Donbas than before the war but it isn’t over. Third, the territorial gains Russia has made will only survive if Ukraine agrees to give them up as part of a ceasefire, that seems unlikely (Ukraine President Zelensky Sets His Terms to End Russia’s Aggression in Ukraine and Vladimir Putin Isn’t Laughing).
The territory lost north of Kherson has more meaning than just symbolic.
Russian logistic support relies on railroads. The logistics capabilities of Russian units are three-quarters that of similar-sized US units. Russian army corps and arms lack a logistics capacity. In this conflict, the Russian Army has used organic transport until civilian vehicles could be pressed into service. The Ukrainian artillery is within striking distance of major Russian railroad lines from Belarus to Western Russia and Donbas.
The Forward Edge of the Battle Area (FEBA) is marked by the thick red lines. While the rail lines and the bridge symbols are for key bridges, the location of the FEBA’s forward edge can be identified with the dark green lines. Concentric rings signify the range of Ukrainian artillery.
Credit to Def Mon via Twitter @DefMon3.
Below is an overview of the area. Izyum, the logistic and command centre for the Russian Army’s northern region of Donbas is home to the Russian Army’s logistics and command centers. It can be found just west from the railway intersection in the lower right corner of the map.
Follow @criticalthreats to get credit for Critical Threats
Recall that Izyum is where the Russians nearly lost their Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov last weekend, Mysterious Ammunition Dump Explosion Rocks Russia and Did Ukraine Nearly Kill Russia’s Top Military Officer?
The Russian Army is unable to access the rail line that passes within the reach of Ukrainian artillery or the Switchblade drones of special operations forces.
This is why it is important. According to the Department of Defense, the major Russian effort is Izyum.
The U.S. thinks Russia is focusing on Sloviansk, and has narrowed its focus on the Donbas’ northern frontier of advancement from Izyum to Russia.
Due to Ukrainian resistance, two other advances were halted.
Russia is in control of Popasna, after confirmation from 🇺🇦 officialshttps://t.co/v1bOEqW3Od
— Jack Detsch (@JackDetsch) May 10, 2022
NOTE: Popansa is the lost town to the Russians and can be found in the circle at the bottom of this image.
It is safe to assume that there will be no good news if the areas for unit assembly and the logistics train are within range of artillery fire.
A bigger picture is needed: Where are we going?
U.S. believes 🇷🇺 is two weeks behind military objectives in Donbas & south.
But Putin is still striving to create a land bridge to Crimea, which 🇺🇸 officials believe he’s all but achieved (other than Mariupol).
Kyiv will remain on the table.
— Jack Detsch (@JackDetsch) May 10, 2022
Russia is much more than “two weeks” behind schedule. The new offensive was announced by Russia just before Easter. Two weeks behind schedule literally means it hasn’t moved (10 Days Into Putin’s ‘New Phase’ of Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine, There Are Minor Advances but the Clock Is Ticking). It was going to be hard. This was my comment when the offensive was first announced.
It is worth noting that the axis from Donetsk-Zaporijia to Donetsk is more than 50 miles long and is cross-compartment. Roads and streams running parallel to the axis. It means that new MSRs will be created and elevated roadbeds can become natural obstacles. 1/
— streiff (@streiffredstate) April 17, 2022
Russia is in three wars that they cannot win. They’re on the verge of losing Kherson. All units N. of Dnipro are at great risk if this happens. To free units and secure the rear, they must seize Mariupol. Finally, they must take Mariupol to free up units and secure rear areas. 3/
— streiff (@streiffredstate) April 17, 2022
It is a difficult task to cross the rivers within the operation area. If you are trained, a river crossing can be a difficult operation. If you haven’t trained for it, it is brutal. If you haven’t trained for it and the enemy has your bridging operation under observation and within range of indirect fires, you are buggered like a fish in a jailhouse shower.
Drone footage of the destroyed 🇷🇺pontoon bridge and equipment near Bilohorivka, Luhansk Oblast. It is also the major axis in the Russian attack against Severodonetsk.
📹via @Arslon_Xudosi pic.twitter.com/C4el94ba0l
— Euromaidan Press (@EuromaidanPress) May 11, 2022
Quick vehicle counts show that the tank company for a tactical battalion was almost exterminated. The loss of tank companies and tactical groups was worse than their loss. There is always a shortage of bridge equipment.
To help you remember how to cross any obstacle is to: Obscure the location where you want to try to lower the obstacle. The combination of artillery and drones from Ukraine makes river crossings very difficult without the help of smoke generators. Especially when the Russians don’t seem all that interested in trying to engage in counterbattery fire with the Ukrainians. (I’ve read of the Russians setting forest/grass fires to try to mask bridging sites, suboptimal but better than nothing, I suppose.)
Today’s report comes from the Ukrainian General Staff.
Interesting. The general staff of Ukraine claimed that Russia has taken the offensive in many vital theaters. In the past when the UGS has made public claims of important shifts, they’ve usually been right. https://t.co/1aGBPXLPz9
— Phillips P. OBrien (@PhillipsPOBrien) May 11, 2022
If you aren’t familiar with the names, those areas cover everything except the three middle green circles on the Important ThreatsMap above
Just a note, NBC’s report of Russian troops being pulled from their direction of attack and sent north to confront the Ukrainian counteroffensive sounds like the Russian retreat I discussed yesterday is much more of a bug-out than a carefully considered operational move.
Ukraine’s forces may be within six miles of the Russian border, according to ISW’s 5/10 report. Russian forces from the Izyum area, located around 75 miles SE of Kharkiv, are reportedly redeploying north to attempt to halt Ukraine’s advance.https://t.co/q7j9qjnF0N
— ISW (@TheStudyofWar) May 11, 2022
Recall the New York Times article. Articles like this assume that Ukrainians have no agency. They just wait and watch for Vladimir Putin’s strategic moves to take place. That isn’t how any of this works In Colonel Harry Summers’ book about our strategic failure to understand the Vietnam War, he recounts an episode when he was a member of the US team discussing the terms of our withdrawal from that war in Paris. His counterpart was a North Vietnamese colonel.
“You know you never defeated us on the battlefied,” said the American colonel.
This comment was pondered by the colonel of North Vietnam for a while. “Thbat may be so,” he replied, “but it also irrlevant.”
.Russia may occupy most of Donbas, but that is becoming increasingly irrelevant as it looks like it doesn’t have the combat power to make those gains stick. An assumption that Volodymyr Zelensky has been waiting impatiently for Vladimir Putin’s offer to make negotiations with him is ridiculous and juvenile.