Is Abortion Good for the Economy? – Opinion

RedState.com is not responsible for guest opinions.

It is important to understand what it means for the Supreme Court that they overturn Roe V. Wade? Large corporations and abortion-loving countries seek to encourage abortion vacation travel and reduce state abortion bans. According to Janet Yellen, Treasury Secretary, and 150 economists, abortion is good economic for. They cite more favorable women’s participation in the labor force, education, and entrepreneurial and other activities. This means that abortion states add to their economic growth, while opposition states reduce this development to their disadvantage. It is a win-win situation for Planned Parenthood.

They find:

“Data regarding women’s participation in the labor market and entrepreneurial activities, as well as their educational accomplishments, professional engagement, and political participation, reveals virtually no consistent correlation with abortion rates or ratios. There can’t be any correlation. Please refer to Tagatz v. Marquette Univ., 861 F.2d 1040, 1044 (7th Cir. 1988). Instead, the data suggest some correlation between abortion, the feminization of poverty, and women’s declining levels of happiness, including fewer and less satisfying long-term committed relationships with partners and the birth of fewer children than women desire by the end of their reproductive lives.”

Catherine Pakaluk is an economist at Catholic University. She was one of the 240 researchers. This issue is not addressed in any of the studies, and it represents an obvious flaw in the current research. Indeed, Pakaluk says that economists who claim to provide conclusive evidence about the overall positive social or economic benefits of abortion should, “say upfront that what we’re about to tell you depends upon neglecting the costs to the unborn child because we don’t think his or her costs count.”

Many corporations and states that support abortion will continue to believe in faulty research. They will not pay any attention to the cost of dead babies (63 millions under). Roe(Half female), or the apparent loss in the economy caused by people being denied the opportunity to live productive lives. Under the watchful eye of anti-Christian left, they cannot admit the truth.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s concurrence was revoked RoeThe Supreme Court says the Constitution doesn’t have a neutral position on abortion. It is neither pro- or anti. The Supreme Court did not have any basis to support this conclusion. RoeIt has no basis to form an opinion about abortion. The only thing that would be possible is to repeal Roe and let the states decide. This allows the court to reverse other rulings that have been made without a basis in the Constitution. But, this door-opener comes with a price. In essence, the Court gives the state the freedom to decide whether or not they want to allow abortion. Some states may even allow infanticide.

I had previously argued in an article that the Court shouldn’t revoke. Roe. The court must state that abortion can only be permitted when the mother’s life is in danger. Subterfugees must also be proved. This rule could lead to around 100 abortions per year. But such a decision, however good at saving lives, would have been a capitulation to the living Constitution fraud and in violation of Kavanaugh’s clear legal reasoning.

Abortion is not justified if it does not have the potential positive effects. However, economics are not the only factor at play. Radical feminism is not only based on economics, but also includes abortion. This abortion is a religious concept that feminist leaders can’t ignore. Essentially, to admit that they were wrong all these years would be a repudiation of their life’s work. Even if they did, it would be impossible to repudiate Margaret Sanger’s racial foundation of abortion. However, it is possible for women and men to change their minds after the long-term leaders are gone. Also, the chance will open up for Christians who support abortion because of poor economic research to go back to their fundamental Christian beliefs.

Christopher Garbacz ([email protected]) She is now a policy adviser at The Heartland Institute.