A Closer Look Reveals the Bureaucratic Bottleneck at the Heart of the Baby Formula Shortage  – Opinion

The PR disaster of a struggling administration finally brought about a solution to the problem with baby formula.

You got the sense of just how disorganized the Biden administration is when one of their prominent mouthpieces on the most current crisis was — Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg?! I don’t know too many people who saw the former mayor with such limited transport experience he could not fix potholes, as the logical choice to weigh in on Enfamil rationing. Perhaps he is considered an expert for his two-month paternity break that he took to launch his new career.

The incompetent news was that while stores were emptying, border illegals were gazing at shelves filled with immigrants in immigration holding areas. Yes, shipping and storage were key factors in this bizarre situation where citizens’ babies went hungry while gate-crashers were filling their little ones with food, but this was yet another misstep by the administration to starve infants. What is the reason for the infant shortage, even as Buck-neverarriving Biden searches for excuses?

It all started in February with an FDA warning that certain lines of formula were being recall. A processing facility located in Sturgis (Michigan).Abbot Laboratories operates the Abbot Laboratories. It supplies up to 40% of the nation’s baby formula supply. This plant was shut down for 3 months. Stop-gap solutions have been attempted to compensate, which included importing additional supplies.

It is important to ask how much was required. The FDA made some observations following January’s inspection of the facility. Cronobacter infection and Salmonella Newport were reported by consumers. Assumed to be the reason, contaminated formula. After the voluntary recall, there were only a few reported cases and two infant deaths, which led to the closure of the facility.

Questions have been raised about whether or not the FDA was too broad. The idea that Abbot could soon return to operation was first suggested this week. This will require It takes approximately 2 weeksIt took six to eight weeks to bring the plant back into full operation. Then, it would take another six to 8 weeks before their product could reach retail shelves. The FDA was right in closing down the plant. It was unnecessary, Abbot claims.

The company has delivered its version of events, and while it is just one side of the story, there likely is some degree of validity or they’d run the risk of incurring a further penalty for false information. There is not concern that the government is releasing false information. As Press Secretary for the last time, she will be gone Friday. Jen Psaki said that the Abbot plants were endangered.The formula was deemed unsafe for infants and it was subsequently discontinued.

But this is wrong. FDA Never established a connectionThere was a link between infants infected by the Abbot formula and those who consumed it. The CDC examined the cases and found that the virus strains found in Abbot were not compatible with the ones tested by genetic sequencing. The fact that two of the infants who perished in the accident were unmatched with the virus strains was another indicator of infection. This could have been due to cross-contamination within the home.

Jake Tapper thought he was refuting a claimAbbot’s comments on Jen Psaki. He refers to Bloomberg articleHe was focusing on a September inspection report on inspections at the plant. But he tends to focus on the headlines and ignores the details. Bloomberg still says that Abbot’s formula was responsible for the babies getting sick in the last week of its report. This is despite numerous qualifiers. (Emphasis added.)

During a routine visit to Abbott’s Sturgis, Michigan, manufacturing facility in September, inspectors determined that employees Could haveTransferred contaminants, including the deadly cronobacter, from surfaces to baby formula

Bloomberg reviewed the FDA document of 39 pages and found that it was observed by inspectors how the products worked. It could be still contaminated.  

Even worse, the plant might test its product before pulling out stock to avoid any potential problems.

Abbott found cronobacter on a batch of finished formula. This could have resulted from a worker touching a contaminated surface while not changing his gloves. That batch wasn’t distributed. 

Abbot Formula was not found to be a source of infection in infants according to FDA and CDC testing. This was determined in April, however, and the plant was not given any clearance to return to production – until today. An announcement was made to announce that the facility would soon reopen and will resume its normal production schedule. This means there will be a return to something approaching normal supplies – after the 4th of July.

There seems to be a strong desire among many people to place the current shortages at Abbot’s factory closure as an appropriate safety measure. While safety is a top priority, common sense and expediency could also have been applied here – traits that are in even shorter supply in the government than stores currently face with formula.

Follow Us