A tip for those who support abortion. Talking about abortion is not the same as discussing ax murders. People will think about the fate of unborn children whose lives have been taken if you do.
Maya Wiley (failed NYC mayoral candidate, former MSNBC contributor), appeared on Jonathan Capehart’s MSNBC Sunday morning. However, she took that disgusting route.
As a desperate attempt to link current events with Halloween, she stated, in reference to the Supreme Court arguments tomorrow regarding Texas’ abortion law.
It is sort of like that, because we are approaching Halloween.When the music gets too scary, you can tell someone is about to be axe-murdered. This is essentially what we should hear before the Monday argument.”
Planned Parenthood might consider playing this kind of music in their waiting rooms.
Wiley stated that it was in Roe V. WadeThe Supreme Court “upheld” the Constitution’s right to abort. The Supreme Court didn’t affirm that right. It created an inexistent right by creating it. It is something that an honest MSNBC legal correspondent has acknowledged.
A pro-abortion MSNBC guest, making a horrid analogy suggesting that the SCOTUS case on the Texas abortion law brings ax murders to mind, was sponsored in part by T-Mobile, Safelite, and Procter & Gamble, maker of Downy.
The transcript is here.
MSNBC
Sunday Show
10.31/21
10:27 am EDTJONATHAN CAPAPEHART: Maya. The abortion arguments will be tomorrow. They’re Monday. Why should this be a case we are watching on Monday with such great interest?
MAYA WILEY (English): It’s great to be with Jonathan. I love and miss you. It’s almost like this.As Halloween is fast approaching, you may have noticed that the music gets more and more frightening as you get closer to death. That is the kind of music you should hear before we get into Monday arguments.
The Texas abortion ban will result in two cases. We will say that anyone can sue any provider to get compensation for wanting to have an abortion.
It has effectively stopped all Texas abortions. This case will be procedural. But what this procedure does — it is crucial — is that it determines whether Texas is allowed to intentionally undermine a constitutional rights that was upheld by the Supreme Court in 1973.
Now, let’s say that we will pretend you still possess the constitutional right but allow states to make copies of this law. This will effectively give away constitutional rights to people who could otherwise exercise their right to choose. That will serve as a gauge for the December 1st decision, when they decide to take up the Mississippi Case, which directly runs against Roe V. Wade. This is why I saidIt’s almost like building terror music.
About Post Author
