As we previously reported, on Monday night Project Veritas released a new report announcing that they’d obtained US military documents proving that Dr. Anthony Fauci had lied to Congress and, more specifically, “never-before-seen documents regarding the origins of COVID-19, gain of function research, vaccines, potential treatments which have been suppressed, and the government’s effort to conceal all of this.”
One document, an August 13, 2021 report on Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) letterhead from the Commandant of the Marine Corps Fellow, DARPA to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense carries the subject line: “SARS CoV-2 Origins Investigation With US Government Program Undisclosed Document Analysis.” The analysis reports that the 2018 EcoHealth Alliance coronavirus research proposal that DARPA rejected because it was too risky and it likely violated the gain of function research ban was then funded by NIH/NIAID and that SARS-CoV-2 – a/k/a COVID-19 – resulted from that research.
The more explosive parts of the report were not narrated by O’Keefe, but were in the screenshots shown. Project Veritas only showed one page, but other sections of the report were also shown.
Project Veritas identified the source as Marine Corps Maj. Joseph Murphy (then-Commandant Marine Corps Fellow, DARPA). According to his LinkedIn page, Maj. Murphy is now retired.
The memo’s first page is composed of:
SARS CoV-2 (or its precursor virus) is an American-created, recombinant bat vaccination. According to the reports surrounding the laboratory leak hypothesis, it was developed by EcoHealth Alliance at Wuhan Institute of Virology. Since the outbreak, details about this program were kept secret. These details can be found in the EcoHealth Alliance proposal response to the DARPA PREEMPT program Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) HR00118S0017, dated March 2018 – a document not yet publicly disclosed.
It is extremely comprehensive in its contents. Peter Daszak describes step-by-step the plans of the organization, by phase and location. These include the roles of primary scientists, as well as their institutions. It is a separate document that contains the funding plan. Details can help you understand why medical countermeasures, such as masks or mRNA vaccines, do not work. It is obvious why early treatment protocols are effective as curatives.
SARS-CoV-2’s form as it emerged is likely as a precursor, deliberately virulent, humanized recombinant SARSr-CoV that was to be reverse engineered into a live attenuated SARSr-CoV bat vaccine. The EcoHealth Alliance proposal provides context and analysis that allows us to determine its nature. This can be done by joining this analysis to US intelligence data on Wuhan.
Murphy then rebuts the DARPA rejection and claims the proposal was funded by NIAID. Work began on it.
DARPA turned down the proposal as the work could violate the Gain-of-Function (GoF) moratorium. Peter Daszak, however, stated in the proposal that the work wouldn’t. The proposal was not rejected by Dr. Fauci at NIAID, as is well known. It took place at WIV, as well at other sites throughout the US. The details of the proposal are provided.
DRASTIC (the group that initially posted EcoHealth Alliance’s DARPA proposal online) reported that EcoHealth Alliance’s proposal envisioned grant money paying half of WIV scientist Dr. Shi Zhengli’s salary for three years – and that might have been a problem for DARPA, too:
DRASTIC independently assesses that the tone of the proposal (see for instance the ‘our cave complex’) and the deep suggested involvement of some of the WIV parties (Shi Zheng Li employed half-time for 3 years – paid via the grant – and invited to DARPA headquarters at Arlington), may not have helped either – especially in the absence of any DURC risk mitigation program.
On the efficacy of mRNA vaccines, Murphy’s report states:
The gene-encoded, or “mRNA,” vaccines work poorly because they are synthetic replications of the already-synthetic SARSr-CoV-WIV synthetic spike proteins and possess no other epitopes. The mRNA tells cells to make synthetic copies of SARSrCoV-WIV’s synthetic spike proteins directly into their bloodstream. They then spread and create the same ACE2 immune system as the recombinant vaccine. Many physicians in this country believe that symptoms from vaccine reactions mirror those of disease.
The vaccine recipient has no defense against the bloodstream entry, but their nose protects them from the recombinant spike protein quasispecies during “natural infection” (better termed as aerosolized inoculation).
Concerning the highly-stigmatized COVID-19 treatment, hydroxychloroquine (Ivermectin) and ivermectin (hydroxychloroquine).
Ivermectin is a curative that was designated as such in April 2020. This medicine works for all types of illnesses because it inhibits virus replication and regulates the immune response. It is important to note that chloroquinephosphate (Hydroxychloroquine) was identified as a SARSrCOV inhibitor and interferon (identified as curative in May 2020).
Murphy says that the US government recognized interferon, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin as cures for COVID-19, but pharmacists have not filled prescriptions in their place since January 2022. Why? What made it possible to sentence more than 800,000 Americans?
All of this information about the proposed research and all of the experiments that had already taken place (and which were denied by Fauci, Daszak and every scientist they could coerce/threaten) was readily available in EcoHealth Alliance’s response to the PREEMPT BAA, which should have been an unclassified, publicly-available document, right? Right. However, the document was somehow placed in a top secret share drive, according to Murphy’s report:
EcoHealth Alliance’s reply to the PREEMPT BAA is located with the other proposal documents on DARPA Biological Technology Office JWICS (top-secret share drive), address: Network/filer/BTO/CI folder/PREEMPT
Did it cover up? More from Murphy’s report:
DARPA is the first to tackle a technical challenge such as inoculating bats from China. The massive, “Manhattan Project”-level of information suppression executed by the government and the Trusted News Initiative indicates that it would be covered-up if something bad happened. Both the laboratory-leak theory and the squabbling between Senator Paul, Dr. Fauci suggested that this coverup was much more limited. A true cover up would have more control over its paperwork. Therefore, I assumed unclassified files would hide on a greater network. I was able to locate them as I had expected. Once I knew what the files were, their contents, and how they could be used, I was able to push them off-site. Then, this report was created.
Interestingly, Murphy’s fellowship at DARPA ended in August 2021.
If what we know so far about Murphy’s report is correct, there should be (or should have been) corresponding documents at NIH. Given what has happened since the research reportedly started, it wouldn’t be surprising if those documents met shredders and Bleach Bit. But, knowing the cast of characters involved, it also wouldn’t be surprising if they all kept some kind of leverage document to point the finger of blame elsewhere.
What did the Department of Defense’s Inspector General do with Murphy’s report? Is there any other information? Project Veritas may provide additional reporting.
About Post Author
