Twitter aggressively suppressed the Hunter Biden corruption story. Now it has apparently decided against enforcing its “Distribution of hacked materials policy” as private information about GiveSendGo donors spread on the platform. Even though the two situations were allegedly in violation of the same rule, it did so.
Twitter incorrectly claimed that New York Post’s reporting on Hunter Biden’s corrupt business dealings in 2020 was based on “hacked” information. Social media company, Facebook, went to extreme lengths to hide the story. Big Tech censorship may actually have helped swing the 2020 presidential election in favor of Hunter Biden’s father, Joe, per a Media Research Center survey. Now, however, individuals and media outlets are tweeting reportedly hacked private information from GiveSendGo donors to the Canadian Freedom Convoy and “Adopt-a-Trucker” campaigns. Fox News reports that Twitter appears to be remarkably passive in such a situation.
According to some reports, GiveSendGo, a Christian platform for fundraising was compromised and trolled. a video that accused the trucker convoy protesters of being “extremists” and a “threat to democracy.” The video also said hackers would share data from the trucker convoy. The data has been published in parts by multiple outlets. The Washington PostThe Ottawa CitizenFox News reported that Dean Blundell (Canadian radio personality) and Jeremy Sullivan (American television host) shared the information in some way on Twitter. Twitter has not provided context labels for or removed several of these tweets, which seem to violate Twitter’s “Distribution of hacked materials policy.”
It policy states, “[W]e don’t permit the use of our services to directly distribute content obtained through hacking by the people or groups associated with a hack.” Twitter defines a hack “as an intrusion or access of a computer, network, or electronic device that was unauthorized or exceeded authorized access.”
That policy concludes, “We recognize that source materials obtained through leaks can serve as the basis for important reporting … [we] believe our responsibility is to provide additional context that is useful in providing clarity to the conversation that happens on Twitter.” Furthermore, Twitter’s private information policy also states that sharing private information online without permission is a “breach” of privacy and Twitter’s rules. However, many tweets that allegedly contain hacked personal information and link to hacked data do not have context labels.
The Washington PostBased on the hacker information, we contacted the donors and made a map that showed the locations of Freedom Convoy donors in America. The PostAlso included are donor information, such as names and donations amounts. Not all donors seem to have responded. The Post’s contact attempts. The PostTwitter published the article on the official verified account. Twitter has not removed the tweet since publication. Tweets by Ottawa CitizenBlundell is also not censored, as per publication.
Conservatives under attack. Get in touch with Twitter @ (415) 222-9670For conservatives to have equal access to Big Tech, they must demand accountability. We can help you if your information has been blocked. Contact the Media Research Center Use the contact formHelp us to hold Big Tech responsible.
About Post Author
You may also like
-
Choosing the Right Warehouse Cleanout Company for Large-Scale Transitions
-
Surviving Narcissistic Abuse
-
The Art of Negotiation – How Attorney John Coco Transforms Insurance Roadblocks into 7-Figure Settlements
-
How to Transition from a Work Visa to Permanent Residency in the U.S.
-
A Relaxing Path to Your Dream Home