Teachers Dish on How They Push Progressive Transgender Ideology in K-12 Classrooms – Opinion

More teachers are openly revealing how they indoctrinate students to a progressive view of gender identity. However, educators insist that they influence small children to adopt their views on transgenderism, despite the national backlash.

For each piece The Washington PostLaura Meckler, the author of this article, interviewed teachers in order to learn how they deal with gender issues in classrooms. Their responses were quite illuminating and further demonstrate why more parents must push back against these brazen attempts to mold our children’s minds.

The author explained that some lessons regarding gender identity take a direct approach: “Who can describe what transgender means?” In other instances, they can be more subtle: “Remember, families can come in all shapes and sizes!”

One of the ways teachers condition children is by using gender-neutral terms so they don’t view different genders differently. A teacher might greet their students by saying, “Good morning, scholars,” instead of “Good morning, boys and girls!”

The author of the piece explains that “[r]esources and lesson plans for those who want to teach about gender identity are becoming much more common,” and that “[s]even states now require that curriculums include LGBTQ topics.”

Despite attempts to make this type of teaching more common, “[c]lasses that address gender identity are still the exception in American schools,” according to Meckler. However, if this is true, it won’t remain this way for much longer–if there is no resistance to this push to include the teachings in every classroom.

Another way teachers promote transgender ideology, especially in elementary schools, is to teach their students that there are no “boy colors” or “girl colors.” Others use a book titled “I Am Jazz,” which is the story of a transgender girl who claims “I have a girl brain but a boy body,” and explains that “[t]His name is Transgender. I was born this way!”

A lesson plan directed at six-year-old, first-grade students called “Pink, Blue and Purple” teaches them that gender is not fixed.

“You might feel like you’re a boy even if you have body parts that some people might tell you are ‘girl’ parts,” the teachers are instructed to repeat. “You might feel like a girl even if you have body parts that some people tell you are ‘boy’ parts. And you might not feel like you’re a boy or a girl, but you’re a little bit of both. No matter how you feel, you’re perfectly normal!”

These lessons are aimed at children from as young as 4 years of age. A Massachusetts teacher shows kindergarten students how gender pronouns are used. “He introduces the terms transgender and gender queer but doesn’t fully define them because that is too much for kindergartners, said the teacher, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because his district did not authorize him to speak publicly,” Meckler wrote.

He also did not categorize body parts according to gender. He said, “[w]e don’t say a penis belongs to a man.” Instead, he said it belongs to a human. He also tells children that even if a doctor says of a baby’s birth, “It’s a boy!” he might not be a boy. “Someone who was born a boy may not feel they are a boy.”

Others teachers however are more cautious. Sacramento teachers do not discuss gender identity with sixth- and fifth graders.

Another popular plan for teaching middle schoolers is HealthSmart. The plan also instructs teachers to not assign body parts to different genders. It also refers to people as “partners” instead of boyfriend or girlfriend.

Even though the article is published, progressives still believe schools don’t try to get children to accept their views on gender identity. They will pretend there are no efforts to indoctrinate children.

The reason why is simple: It’s nearly impossible to defend presenting this type of material to small children. Most parents do not agree, so school districts use policies that keep their children as informed as possible. The Parental Rights in Education bill had overwhelming support – even from most Democrats. The messaging battle is losing ground on this topic. This does not necessarily mean that they’re failing to promote their agenda in the K-12 schools. If this is to stop, those who are opposed to it will need to do even more.