Tea Party Patriots Action Files Complaint Against Mar-a-Lago Raid Judge Bruce Reinhart – Opinion

Is anyone else astonished at the transformation of legacy media, from classified documents in Mar-a-Lago Raid back to Joe Biden’s plan for handling student loan debt

That’s because the narrative on the Mar-a-Lago Raid is no longer in the Department of Justice’s favor. On Saturday, Nick Arama, my colleague wrote:

As we previously reported, intel officials were leaking to Newsweek that the FBI was looking for documents including those related to the Russia collusion hoax. After journalist Paul Sperry tweeted about that about a week ago, he got booted from Twitter. However, he posted on Gettr a stunning post about how the counterintelligence unit which was involved in Russia collusion investigations (Crossfire Hurricanes) now had been implicated in Trump’s raid. He also revealed that Special Counsel John Durham was investigating some of the suspects.

Sperry has now expanded on that Gettr post about it being the same unit that was involved in Crossfire Hurricane and the FBI raid.

On Monday, former President Donald Trump filed a motion for a “Special Master” to oversee the review of the documents seized from the raid.

The American people’s outrage over the raid is still off the chain, as revealed in a Rasmussen poll showing 53 percent of Americans think that the FBI is, “Joe Biden’s personal Gestapo.”

Thursday should be the due date for the DOJ, to disclose the redactions to the affidavit authorizing a search warrant. Further scrutiny will also be placed upon Judge Bruce Reinhart who was tapped by the DOJ as the federal magistrate to issue the warrant.

Tea Party Patriots Action (TPPA), filed a complaint with the Judicial Council of the Eleventh Circuit against Judge Reinhart on Wednesday.

[TPPA] announced today that it filed a complaint for “unethical and prejudicial conduct” against Judge Bruce E. Reinhart, the judge who approved the warrant to search President Trump’s residence. The complaint accuses Judge Reinhart of having a “conflict of interest and a pattern and history of hostility to President Trump.”

My colleague Bonchie uncovered some of Judge Reinhart’s extremely questionable background:

Astonishingly, he quit his job as a prosecutor to go work for infamous sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein’s associates, and he helped secure immunity deals for many of the low-life enablers who surrounded Epstein.

How do all these government officials continue to end up in Jeffrey Epstein’s orbit? I could speculate, but I’ll leave that question open-ended. It seems an awful conflict to me that a former U.S. attorney would immediately defend those who were being attacked by the government. He was a DOJ veteran who helped secure these sweetheart deals. Reinhart appears to be against Donald Trump.

The TPPA complaint lists seven “undisputed facts” with receipts supporting their accusations:

1. Judge Reinhart has denigrated Donald Trump publicly.

The featured image above is one example of the judge’s bias and disdain toward Trump. He doesn’t even pretend to hide it.

2. That Judge Reinhart recused himself from a lawsuit between Trump and Hillary Clinton, citing a “conflict of interest.”

3. It is notable that Judge Reinhart had a long history of ethical problems, including his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

It is a mind-boggling connection that has been largely ignored by legacy media.

Partake in the course.

4. Judge Reinhart is a close Democrat Party member, with his financial contributions to Jeb Bush’s former president Barack Obama.

5. That Judge Reinhart’s partisan leanings and lack of objectivity toward former President Trump should have been cause enough for him to recuse himself when approached by the DOJ to issue the search warrant for Mar-a-Lago. Reinhart did not do this in the case.

6. Judge Reinhart is not able to meet the ethical standards and character required for the role of judge.

The biography of Reinhart, who was appointed federal magistrate judge by the United States District Court of Florida stated:

In addition to his private practice, Mr. Reinhart previously served on the Court’s CJA Panel representing indigent criminal defendants, served as an Ethics Commissioner on The Palm Beach County Commission on EthicsHe also provided pro bono representation to federal prisoner through the Clemency Project 2014 program, which was jointly created by many bar associations in order to help them with their clemency applications.

Mine Emphasis.

For a moment, let that sink in.

7. That Judge Reinhart’s actions and authorization in the search warrant threatens the principle of “equal justice under law” and the confidence of the American people in an unbiased judiciary.

Jenny Beth Martin was also honored as Honorary Chairman of the TPPA.

“Judge Reinhart acted unethically in approving the warrant to search President Trump’s residence.

“He should be disciplined and removed as a federal magistrate. The entire episode involving the search of former President Trump’s home threatens the principle of ‘equal justice under law’ and the confidence of the American people in an unbiased judiciary.”

It is unlikely that Judge Reinhart will be removed. But TPPA’s action is serving to cast additional sunlight and transparency on the tactics used by the DOJ to justify this unprecedented raid. Merrick Garland prefers to keep the details of his tactics secret and out of sight.

About Post Author

Follow Us