Many red flags have appeared about Judge Ketanji brown Jackson, a Biden nominee for the United States Supreme Court. This was evident during her Senate confirmation hearings. Readers may remember the bizarre exchange, in which Jackson told committee members that she could not define what a “woman” is, because she “isn’t a biologist.”
The most recent example came on Friday, when she answered a line of written questions from Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) about natural rights by stating that she didn’t “hold a position on whether individuals possess natural rights.” But while most Republican senators are in agreement with Minority Leader Mitch McConnell that Jackson is unquestionably a “no” vote, it’s possible that some of the usual suspects in the GOP somehow remain on the fence about this truly out-of-the-mainstream nominee. And of course, there might be some on the other side of the aisle who aren’t in lockstep with the far-left looneys in the Democrat Party.
Now, there’s written proof that the previously reported revelations about Judge Jackson’s extremely lenient sentencing in cases involving sex offenders were just the tip of the iceberg. On Friday, courtroom transcripts and prosecutor memos from the cases on Jackson’s docket with defendants accused of distributing child-porn were released. (And I’ll warn you in advance: some of the content is not easy to read, as it involves crimes against children, even babies, and (Contains graphic descriptions of sexual acts.
New York Post
In the eight child-porn cases that came before her court, former D.C. District Court Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson heard horrifying details of “sadomasochistic” torture of young kids — including “infants and toddlers” — yet challenged the disturbing evidence presented by prosecutors and disregarded their prison recommendations to give the lightest possible punishments in each case, according to transcripts of sentencing hearings obtained by the Post.
In some cases, she even apologized to some of the kiddie-porn perverts for having to follow the statutes, which she called “substantially flawed.”
[…]
In July 2020, Jackson gave the bare minimum sentence to a defendant convicted of distributing images and videos of infants being sexually abused, and who had boasted of molesting his 13-year-old cousin, even though she knew the defendant refused “to take full responsibility” for his crimes, a transcript reveals. In 2018, Christopher Michael Downs was busted trading child porn in a private online chat room, “Pedos Only,” including images of adult males raping “a prepubescent female child,” according to court records. There were 33 images, one of which was a picture of a young naked girl child. Downs, then 30, told the group, “I once fooled around with my 13-year-old cousin.” He also uploaded a 10-second video of “a prepubescent female lying in a bathtub and with an adult male inserting his penis into her mouth.”
This continues:
Jackson herself admitted that the felon was at “risk of reoffending,” the transcript further reveals. But she declined to enhance his prison time based on the amount of porn he distributed, arguing such enhancements were “outdated” and “substantially flawed.” She acknowledged the average sentence nationally “for similarly situated defendants” was 81 months, but she gave him the statutory mandatory-minimum sentence of 60 months, which was short of the nearly six years prosecutors asked for. Jackson allowed him to receive credit for his time served beginning in October 2018 when Downs was first imprisoned. This makes it 38 months or just over three years technically in her pen. Downs will be released in December.
I encourage you to read the details on the other cases outlined in the Post’s piece.
Also, the memos and transcripts have been released (which can also be read). hereThe Article Three Project’s digital ads, which contain damning information from documents, started airing in eight US states, including my state of Arizona, on Friday.
Senators @SenMarkKelly @SenatorSinemaBefore elevating Judge Jackson as the highest court of the nation, it is important to consider what the future holds for the Arizona children. pic.twitter.com/bh4CRWuOFi
— The Article III Project (A3P) (@Article3Project) April 1, 2022
Nick Arama is my co-worker Previous writing, Arizona Sens. Kyrsten Sinema and Mark Kelly — both Democrats — have pushed back on recent, radical moves from the Biden Administration, including the sunsetting of the Title 42 immigration policy put in place by President Donald Trump. It’s not outside the realm of possibility that swing-state Democrats like them could be persuaded to stand against this wrongheaded and disastrous nominee to the highest court in the land. You can read the full article here all of the adsIf you would like to share this tweet thread with your Arizona, Georgia or Utah lawmaker/s, West Virginia legislators, Alaska, Maine and Nevada lawmakers, please use the following Twitter thread.
Judge Ketanji brown Jackson isn’t the person for our Constitution and Founding documents. And we must make sure that our representatives in Washington know our will at this crucial moment in our nation’s history.
About Post Author
You may also like
-
From Science to Storytelling: How Sara Winokur Brings Forensic Genetics to Life in Ivory Bones
-
What is an Electronic Flight Certificate? A Clear Explanation
-
Faith and Tattoos: Exploring the Intersection of Belief and Body Art
-
Top 10 Best Financial Management Apps for 2025: Streamline Your Finances with These Top-Rated Apps
-
Promoting Higher Education in Kentucky