Liberal Judge Rules Ousting Illegal Aliens Who Reenter the Country ‘Racist’ and ‘Unconstitutional’ – Opinion

Surprised to find out that fraud and drugs are not the most popular cases federal prosecutors file. According to The Washington Times this honor is given to illegal aliens trying to enter the country again after being deported. Almost all of those who are charged are Hispanic.

Now, according to The Times, federal courts are facing the ridiculous question of whether the “imbalance” in deportations means U.S. immigration law is… wait for it… racist.

Ridiculous? Nevada courts have interpreted it as such.

Judge Miranda Du, an Obama appointee [no kidding?], said the section of immigration law that makes it a felony for an illegal alien previously ousted to sneak back into the country “has racist antecedents dating to the 1920s.” This is insane.

Though the law has been updated since then, noted The Times, Congress has never “confronted the racist, nativist roots” of the law, Du ruled. She said that fact — coupled with the overwhelmingly Hispanic targets for prosecution — makes the law unconstitutional. This is Beyond insane 

Ahilan Aulanantham was co-director of UCLA School of Law’s Immigration Law and Policy Center. She is a noted scholar in the history of illegal-reentry law and told The Times this interview:

If we are trying to uproot systemic racism, that means we have to consciously understand what motivated a law’s original enactment, and then make the conscious decision whether we want to change it or whether we want to continue it.

How does it make a difference? MotivationBehind the enactment and enforcement of law

The section of the illegal reentry law in question, section 1326 of Title VIII of the U.S. Code, governs “reentry of removed aliens,” noted The Times.

A conviction for reentry could result in a sentence of up to two years prison. A person with a drug record or a simple felony can get up to 10 or more years imprisonment, or even 20 years for someone who has an aggravated crime record. The question of whether or not this happens at all is another matter.

Kris Kobach, a former Republican secretary of state in Kansas and prominent legal figure among groups pushing for stricter immigration control thinks the judge’s ruling is ridiculous, as transcribed by The Times.

The judge’s conclusions are ridiculous. On the surface, it’s neutral and justified by many valid reasons that have nothing to with race.

It is nonsense to declare that the statute must be ‘cleansed’ in some way because an unknown number of legislators who supported a predecessor statute a century ago might have been racially biased.

Kobach, of course, is white supremacist.

Kobach, however, was correct. “Ridiculous” doesn’t even begin to describe this latest example of “progressive” insanity. As I’ve suggested multiple times in the past and will undoubtedly continue to suggest in the future, everything Democrats support, oppose, propose, or reject can be connected to the ballot box with no more than two dots.

A special type of rheumatism has been applied to the victims. StoopidIn a world where everything is rooted within systemic racism, and white supremacy is all that is known to man, the Democrats are insane. But here’s the thing: If pollsters stood on the Southern border and found that the majority of illegal aliens streaming across Biden’s porous border would vote overwhelmingly Republican if ever given the right to vote, the Democrats would be frantically doing everything they can in an effort to keep them the hell out of the country. These cases would never happen.

The Biden Border Crisis™ would not exist. Sanity prevailed.

Minimum at the border

RedState is related to:

Biden’s Border Crisis Is Much Worse Than We’re Being Told

Stand-up Comic? Biden Lackey Says Kamala Harris ‘Has Done a Tremendous Job’ on Border Crisis

Illegal Immigration/Open Borders – Democrat Party Voter Register Drive

AOC Busts Biden/Harris — Their Immigration Policies Are ‘Not Working’ and ‘Inhumane’