‘Woman of Faith’ Stacey Abrams’ Pro-Abortion Rationalization Is the Most Ridiculous We’ve Seen Yet – Opinion

The latest episode of Ridiculous Attempts by ‘Faith-Based’ Liberals to Rationalize Embrace of Abortion… 

These are just a few of the many examples. The efforts to make them all are immense. Pro-abortion Liberals, who claim to also be religious believers, will go great lengths to convince voters their acceptance of abortion is within their faith.

“Devout Catholic” Joe Biden, who has been admonished by Pope Francis to stop referring to himself as such, not only supports on-demand abortion until birth; he obscenely refers to the unconscionable practice of killing an unborn human being as an essential health care service.

“Very Catholic Person” Nancy Pelosi, recently excommunicated by San Francisco’s archbishop, refers to late-term abortion as sacred ground. Only the complete lack of moral certainty can surpass hypocrisy.

Then we have Georgia Democrat, gubernatorial candidate, and “woman of faith,” Stacey Abrams.

In video Abrams shared on social media in July, as reported by The Blaze, Abrams attempted to rationalize the oxymoronic: “The decision to be pro-choice is exactly part of my faith.” She added: “I cannot strike down another person’s rights simply because I don’t agree.”

Sorry, no. Abortion is not a “right,” Ms. Adams — despite your misguided actions and those of your pro-abortion brethren to lie about the intent of the Supreme Court’s June decision to overturn Roe V. Wade

As bad, or worse; Abrams’s attempts to exploit the crap out of her “woman of faith” nonsense:

My faith as a woman is a protection shield. I cannot strike down another person’s rights simply because I don’t agree.

These people are simply not ashamed. Worse? They don’t give a damn.

In another mind-blowing moment in the video, Abrams — who again, avidly supports murdering unborn children until birth — incredulously declared that, according to her faith, “You protect the vulnerable and you wrap them in your love.” You wanna tell her, or should I?

Abrams wasn’t simply riffing about abortion for the above video; she has a long history of fervent support for on-demand abortion. During a recent interview, Abrams told Yahoo News she believes politicians shouldn’t interfere with a woman’s decision on whether to get an abortion, and her own religious faith has reinforced her pro-abortion-rights views.

This is a medical decision. It is a medical decision. And although your faith traditions may say that you don’t want to make this choice, I am not allowed to force that system upon anyone else. The only value that must override everything is our right to choose, and the freedom that God gave us. As a legislator, it is my duty to ensure that doctors, nurses and other medical professionals have the right to make decisions about medical care and politicians are not excluded.

You got it. In Abrams’s mind, Doctors should have the right to make life or death decisions for the most vulnerable among us — human beings who cannot yet make those decisions for themselves.

Coupla questions, Ms. Abrams.

Why should a disinterested doctor or nurse, as you say, have the “right” — given that “right” by a pro-abortion federal government — to end the life of a helpless, perfectly healthy unborn human being, when that decision is not a medical decisionNot as much, you assert, but more aAre you a moral or faith-based person? 

Ms. Abrams! Hypocritical statements like yours about politicians’ role in the continuing battle against abortion are a sign of hypocrisy. While you claim that other politicians — presumably pro-life politicians committed to protecting the unborn — should stay out of the abortion discussion, you and your pro-abortion comrades not only remain up to your eyeballs in the controversy; you fan the flames incessantly.

Find out why! [rhetorical question]

For we are all human. Both are knowledgableYour only purpose is to win votes. This is a shameful way to live.

About Post Author

Follow Us