Whoopi Warns Justice Thomas: They’ll ‘Come for You,’ Bring Back Slavery

With last Friday’s episode being prerecorded, Monday’s edition of The View was the first time the “rabidly pro-choice” coven was able to collectively shriek about the U.S. Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade. The tirades came with co-host Whoopi Goldberg issuing a warning to Justice Clarence Thomas that the court will take aim at his interracial marriage and possibly even rule he’s not a person again and bring back slavery.

Ironically, the broadcast was from the Bahamas in celebration of 25 years The View), Goldberg proclaimed she’s “very pro-life,” has “never been anti-life,” and issued her ominous warning against the Justice. “Well, you better hope that they don’t come for you,” She said: “we were not in the Constitution either. We were not even people in the Constitution.”

Elle suggested to him that the white conservatives at the court could turn against him and declare his interracial union to Ginni Tom null.

Clarence, they won’t be coming for you. Your wife should be white and you shouldn’t be married.They will, they’ll move it, and you should hope nobody tells you. You’re not even in the Constitution. Now you’re back as a quarter-personBecause that won’t work.

Before saying that at Thomas, Goldberg lashed out at pro-life “female governors” who were celebrating the fate of Roe, “[T]You can be a voice to the still, but you must also be present. Be a voice for the ones you can also see,” The unborn baby in the womb was dismissed by her as she grinned. “And stop saying to people that this is a win for all women because it’s not.”

 

 

Continuing to ignore the “shout your abortion” movement and the women on social media literally throwing abortion parties, Goldberg again wrongly declared that “no one” “make[s] this horrific decision … with a smile on their face. Nobody.”

Ana Navarro, their co-host, doubled down her ghoulish argument about her mentally handicapped relatives being terminated in another segment of the screeching.

It is wrong and hypocritical to prevent a family making the best decision for their children. Doesn’t mean that you don’t love your special needs family members, that you don’t adore them and they aren’t part of the family.

You can show your loved ones that you care by killing them.

Navarro also made the case for her family and argued that children must be fed to prevent child abuse.

They will ban the choice of a family, which means that there will be many more kids who don’t have the financial resources to afford it. More children will be adopted. More children will be placed in foster care. It will become more common for children to be neglected.

Since Navarro still claims to be a Republican, she should know the pro-life movement has been relentless, yet she suggested “nobody ever thought that the dog would actually catch the bus.”

There is no collection of asinine and insane comments. The ViewYou wouldn’t be complete without some from mentally unstableSunny Hostin summarized recent SCOTUS rulings. “it’s time to welcome all this new life, yet we can shoot them with our newly available, completely unrestricted guns.”

This rabid pro-choice show was made possible because of lucrative sponsorships from Liberty Mutual and Macy’s. This link will take you to their contact information.

You can find the transcript below. To read it, please click on “expand”.

ABC’s The View
June 27, 2022
Eastern, 11:05:17

(…)

ANA NAVARRO – This Supreme Court decision was leaked. It was obvious for several months that this would happen, yet it is still shocking. It’s probably because it has been an issue of political wedge for many years.

The bus would be taken by the dog, which I believe was never in the minds of anyone. We now have to accept the consequences and, as you can see, there is division within the country.

Then I wondered what might have happened if there had been that leak months ago.

SUNNY HOOSTIN: My goodness.

NAVARRO – This is a total shock for America.

WHOOPI GOLDBERG

JOY BEHAR: Would you say it was worse or more?

NAVARRO

HOSTIN: That would have been even worse.

SARA HAINES: It’s worse.

HOSTIN : What was interesting to me, however? I took the leak draft. Then I began comparing it to my current opinion. You will be surprised at how similar they are.

GOLDBERG: Yeah.

HOSTIN – They look almost the same, which struck me very much. The court was basically telling Brian, what can I tell you? That it’s now time to accept all the new life. Yet, we have the ability to shoot them using our completely unrestricted guns.

HAINES: Right.

[Applause]

HOSTIN: It was kind of surprising to me that that conflict had occurred.

(…)

Eastern, 11:07:14

NAVARRO

BEHAR: Yeah.

NAVARRO: Arkansas, and all the other states which have ready trigger laws and are prohibiting a person — the choice of a family or a woman — have the worst social service in America.

BEHAR: Yes. Always.

NAVARRO It’s a hard conversation and some feel that we should not be discussing social services. It is not appropriate to talk about foster and adoption, or about families with special needs. And the special services that may be required in this conversation.

My position is that it would be hypocritical to prohibit a family’s freedom of choice about what’s best. Doesn’t mean that you don’t love your special needs family members, that you don’t adore them and they aren’t part of the family. However, we have seen firsthand the difficulties of begging for assistance over years.

They will ban the choice of a family, which means that there will be more poverty children. More children will be adopted. More children will be placed in foster care. It will become more common for children to be neglected.

GOLDBERG: Right.

NAVARRO – There will be many other things. The hypocritical states must step in and offer the necessary services.

(…)

Eastern at 11:10 a.m.

GOLDBERG: This idea is that these female governors, who sit there discussing, you know what, want to be a force for good. You can be a voice for those you also see. This is not a win-win situation for all women.

This is the whole point of it, and I will repeat it. While we know that it isn’t, everyone may not agree with this statement. However, there’s one thing we can all agree upon. Your family and you have the power to determine what is best for you and for your family. This is your right. You can decide, “no. I will never have an abortion” because that’s what the law allows. The law says that I do not have to have an abortion, but that if you feel that you do, or that incest is required, you can think about all the terrible things.

HOSTIN: There are exceptions.

GOLDBERG Nobody. This is what it’s all about. This is what we are referring to. It’s not your responsibility to do so. It’s about your right to decide.

(…)

Eastern, 11:19:54

GOLDBERG : This is not the decision of anyone else, and I would like to be very clear. My position is very pro-life. I have never opposed life. While I believe people should have their lives as they choose, I do not want anyone to dictate how they live them.

While I respect the beliefs of all religions, I don’t subscribe to any. I won’t request you to join mine and you don’t have the right to inform me based on religious beliefs.

And what about the future? Clarence Thomas signals that they want to eliminate contraception. Are you able to understand? You don’t need to, sir.

BEHAR: This is crazy. But that’s crazy.

GOLDBERG – But they don’t have to!

BEHAR: It is absurd.

HOSTIN: All the options are available now. Contraception is available. The gay marriage option is available now

GOLDBERG : He better hope! We were also not included in the Constitution. The Constitution did not include us as people.

HOSTIN: Nothing is precedent anymore.

GOLDBERG – Well Clarence, it’s best to hope they don’t make an appearance and tell you that you shouldn’t be married to a white woman. You can be sure they’ll move it. It’s impossible to go back to the quarter-person status.

(…)

About Post Author

Follow Us