A proposed law in the United Kingdom (U.K.) would reportedly regulate social media like a “hazard industry,” with new methods of censorship. Advocates for free speech should be worried.
Parmy Opinion Columnist Parmy Olson of Bloomberg wrote that the U.K. Online Safety Bill would enable Ofcom, the communications regulator to impose large-scale fines and criminal charges on social media company executives for violations. The proposed law would reportedly provide Ofcom with “internal research” so that Ofcom could inform a social media company “to tweak its algorithms to change those statistics, or be punished.”
The proposed law reportedly follows the suggestions of Facebook “whistleblower” Frances Haugen. Haugen lauded the bill’s approach as “world-leading,” according to Olson on Bloomberg Opinion. Haugen was found to be leftist activist and have ties with prominent Democrats. Haugen advocated also for more social media censorship.
Social media platforms would be treated as “public environments” rather than publishers by the U.K. bill, an approach that Bloomberg Opinion’s Olson absurdly claimed balances “free speech” and “human welfare.” The coercive nature of the bill, by way of penalties and the threat of criminality, appears to create a much greater incentive to censor, leaving the question of how much of a chilling effect on free speech there will be if the bill becomes law.
U.K. privacy campaign group Big Brother Watch warned that the bill would induce social media platforms to “over-remove” content, according to Olson.
Olson gave an example of content potentially targeted by the law, saying that Ofcom would know if women in a certain area in Britain were likely to consume alleged “Covid misinformation” online. Olson stated that Ofcom could notify social media firms of possible sanctions if they noticed a trend. The proposed law would also reportedly require social media companies to perform “regular risk assessments” and take action on alleged harmful or illegal content.
The U.K. Online Safety Bill may become a “template” for other world governments to approach social media regulation, Olson suggested. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) recently slammed the idea that increased regulation is the answer to social media issues, saying there is no “unbiased arbiter of truth.”
Conservatives under attackYour representatives should be contacted to insist that Big Tech be held responsible for ensuring the First Amendment is mirrored and conservatives are treated equally. If you have been censored, contact us using CensorTrack’s Contact formHelp us to hold Big Tech responsible.
About Post Author
