Twitter Suspended Paul Sperry, but He’s Still Reporting Some Troubling Things About FBI Raid – Opinion

Twitter this week suspended Paul Sperry as a journalist. Sperry claims that he was not given any explanation or warning before he was suspended. However, a tweet from Sperry stated the following:

Funny, don’t remember the FBI raiding Chappaqua or Whitehaven to find the 33,000 potential classified documents Hillary Clinton deleted. It was not her former presidency, but she was only a former secretary.

And:

DEVELOPING: Investigators reportedly met back in June w Trump & his lawyers in Mar-a-Lago storage rm to survey docs & things seemed copasetic but then FBI raids weeks later. Speculation on Hill FBI had PERSONAL stake & searching for classified docs related to its #Spygate scandal.

Sperry also said that “the current deputy general counsel at Twitter is also the former general counsel at FBI HQ under Comey. His name as you may know is James Baker, and he was the top attorney who reviewed the fraudulent anti-Trump FISA wiretap warrants for probable cause.”

Now I don’t know if what Sperry is saying about the speculation of the FBI having a personal stake or being related to Spygate is true. Yes, Hillary is correct. However, when Twitter suspends someone without explaining and he violates any Twitter rules it raises lots of questions.

We’ve seen in the past how Twitter wasn’t shy about shutting down people trying to post about the Hunter Biden laptop prior to the election in 2020.

Here we are again, going into the midterms with a move going on by the FBI against President Donald Trump and Twitter announcing that they are going to be instituting a “civic integrity program” regarding posts about the election that they regard as misleading.

Sperry being acted upon without providing any explanation is troubling.

Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University professor of law, decried Sperry’s move as censoring diverse views and things which were not in the story.

As part of the national dialogue about controversies such as the Mar-a-Lago Raid, social media must be an open platform for the exchange and discussion of views. Twitter has, however, long denied any pretense to neutrality and has resorted to limiting discussion in order for it fit its corporate agenda.

Also, we saw the question regarding Alex Berenson (journalist), who had messages related to his suit against Twitter. This shows that Twitter was being pressured by the White House. He was suspended for one year, and he has been reinstated. Berenson’s case not only raises the question of silencing people who post what they don’t like, but how involved the Democrats are in that process. Berenson stated that he was considering suing Joe Biden in this matter.

But while Sperry is suspended, that’s not stopping him from posting on other social media. He’s now posting two new things.

Now, if this is true — that there are agents who are being investigated by John Durham over their probe of the Russia hoax involved in the raid — that could potentially be read as retaliatory. Combined with the prior comment that may have led to him getting suspended — the speculation that it’s concerning Spygate documents — if true, that could be explosive. We’ll have to see as things develop.

What we know for sure is that these comments are only going to attract more attention. You can’t stop the signal of people questioning what is going on with all this.

About Post Author

Follow Us