Big Tech worked tirelessly to silence pro-life voices, but the censorship can’t stop the Supreme Court from overturning bad precedent.
The Supreme Court documents were leaked to the media, indicating that it could be overturned. Roe V. Wade. Big Tech, the leftist media and other large corporations have supported the Leftist abortion narrative by suppressing pro-life content.
Here are the top five cases of censorship of pro-Life content found in CensorTrack’s database:
- Twitter locked LifeNews.com’s account in April 2022 when the account tweeted an image of an aborted baby. Twitter claimed that sharing the image of the aborted baby violated its rules against sharing “gratuitous gore,” and LifeNews.com was given the option to delete the tweet in order to unlock its account. However, gratuitous is defined as “not necessary” or “unwarranted,” and showing the end result of a policy pushed by the left is neither.
- Facebook tried to silence prolife voices in April. Lila Rose is the founder and president of Live Action tweetedAbout a Colorado law which allows abortion right up to birth. An ex-U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley and Former HUD Secretary Ben Carson posted a screenshot of the Rose tweet with their own commentary. Nikki Haley, former U.S. Ambassador and HUD Secretary Ben Carson posted screenshots of Rose tweets with additional commentary. Facebook made two superficial fact-checks using its biased fact checker network to try and discredit these posts and decrease their engagement.
- Rose stated that Google targeted Live Action, her pro-life foundation, in September 2021. In a post, Rose said the Big Tech giant banned “all” of the pro-life foundation’s ads. She included with her post a purported screenshot from Google that cited “medical misinformation,” “restricted medical content” and “unreliable claims” as its reasoning for the ban.
- After Texas passed its “Heartbeat Bill,” a site was set up to report doctors found violating the new law by performing abortions after six weeks. GoDaddy hosted the site and quickly terminated it after giving the site owners 24 hours’ notice. GoDaddy claimed that the site had violated its terms of service in multiple instances.
- Twitter uses sensitive content filters to reduce engagement and limit reach of pro-life messages. Some cases may call for such filters.
As Pro-Life Action LeagueTwitter placed an account level sensitive content flag. This means that Twitter will hide any image the account tweets behind filters, no matter how innocent they may seem.
Big Tech hates pro-life activism, and works hard for those who work towards constitutional order. The good news? This leaked Supreme Court opinion shows that Big Tech is losing this battle despite concerted efforts by the left to silence anyone fighting for the rights of the pre-born.
Conservatives are being attacked. Tell your representatives to demand Big Tech to be held accountable to the First Amendment and provide transparency for all. Contact us at Media Research Center if you feel your voice has been blocked. Use the contact formHelp us to hold Big Tech responsible.
About Post Author
