The Kyle Rittenhouse trial is the main news story, but there’s another piece of information that has been overlooked. This is the controversial topic of natural immunity to COVID-19. It’s basically treated as nonexistent by both the federal government, and its policies.
The CDC made a shocking admission in a written statement that the agency does not record any natural immunity to COVID-19.
The CDC acknowledges it does not have any documentation that a person who has been vaccinated for Covid was spreading the disease. pic.twitter.com/sYyvMJjhoE
— Eli Klein (@TheEliKlein) November 11, 2021
Now, it would be easy to fall into the trap of thinking this means something it doesn’t technically mean, and I’m sure the “fact-checkers” are frothing at the mouth just reading the introduction of this article. But I’m going to disappoint them because this letter is not proof that those with natural immunity don’t spread COVID-19. In fact, given the dynamics of how the virus spreads, it’s likely that those with natural immunity spread the virus just like those who are vaccinated do, though, there is reason to believe that natural immunity is stronger and more durable.
The point is not to debate the details of COVID-19. It is actually the inability to collect enough data that the issue here. The CDC, which is part of a federal government that has continually downplayed and dismissed natural immunity on a policy level, has now admitted they aren’t even keeping the data necessary to judge its effectiveness. What is the point?
To me, this all sounds very deliberate. If they did gather the data necessary to track the efficacy of natural immunity, they might end up with an answer they obviously don’t want. It is clear that it does not make scientific sense to force vaccines on people who have been through COVID-19. That would blow up the entire “vaccine passport” narrative as well, and we can’t have that, can we?
The CDC continues to make proclamations regarding universal vaccinations, how the virus spreads, and other matters without ever having collected the required data to assess the effectiveness natural immunity. Given the number of people who have already been infected by the coronavirus it ought to have been an immediate priority to gather such data and determine the implications for the pandemic. It is being ignored.
It’s clear that politics is getting in the way. Instead of making policy based upon hard data, this agency, supposedly the best at viral research, doesn’t know anything about how infectious the naturally immune. But trust the “experts” or something.
About Post Author
