Telemundo anchor Nacho Lozanzo displayed his whodunits and judge skills at an early morning analysis on the Rittenhouse trial.
Watch Lozano get all worked up in a two-minute fantasy speech where he questions the jury’s decision, accuses the judge of bias and influencing the jury, blames Rittenhouse for the five counts he was absolved of, and defends the felons chasing Rittenhouse with an “All that was missing was for them to be told not to play the victims here, because you got in the way of the bullets that were defending someone else’s property. But the judge didn’t say that, although it seemed that way.”
Un Nuevo Día
11.22.2021 at 7:00 AM
NACHO LOZANO: It’s 8AM, the time in which I ask you, what’s your take on these two very problematic ironies of life, ironies of the news outlook in this country. The first was the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. He was cleared from all the charges against him. After that, he was found not guilty. The shooting in which Rittenhouse killed and wounded two people was the basis of his conviction. You’ve already seen the details we showed you earlier today. Although relatives of the victims already attributed the crime, they were even more outraged at the judge, who unbelievably asked that victims not be called victims because it seemed unfair to him. Because the prosecutors and the defense would have to label him according to the judge’s perspective- the deceased. All that was missing was for them to be told not to play the victims here, because you got in the way of the bullets that were defending someone else’s property. But the judge didn’t say that, although it seemed that way. The jury absolved him and almost called him a hero because he fired on the victims in self defense, even though it wasn’t his. Funny thing about this story is that he actually lived in another town, so his self defence was to protect someone else. Do you see the point? It was kinda like that.
Taking a shot at being witty (he wasn´t), Lozano started with a play of words about “a problematic irony of the news in this country”, “…he was cleared of all charges of which the accused was accused which was then no longer accused who then became happy because he was found guilty of the shooting- not guilty. Lozano was not found guilty of the August 2020 shooting in which he injured one and killed two people.
Ironies indeed, after delivering the senseless rant, Lozano ended up admitting his fabrication: ….”his self-defense was in defense of someone else- you figure out who that might have been- because he defended the property of others because his own (property) was far from the scene, and this brave person, armed with an assault rifle, defended an empty car lot and killed two individuals in a town that was not his own, getting into a fight that was not his own, but ended up being in self-defense of someone else. That’s it. It was a good thing that the trial did end in this way.”
Assist the MRC to fight bias in liberal media outlets, such as Telemundo. Follow this link.
About Post Author
