The Los Angeles Times posted such a highly ludicrous article Thursday that it’s almost hard to take seriously. But it’s serious as a heart attack because it represents the thinking of a scary number of irrational people behind the war on men.
Column: If men could get pregnant, abortion and baby formula would be free https://t.co/iAXs5RQLL3
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) May 13, 2022
It’s sad, really. In the 90s I moved to California, loved the sunshine and drove around beautiful mountain roads. Every morning I would briskly walk to my LA Times and pick it up. Each page was a delight and I loved every cartoon.
These days are gone. Now Gavin Newsom’s California doesn’t want me to drive, doesn’t want me to water my lawn, doesn’t want me to use electricity. And the LA Times certainly doesn’t want me to read it, because a decade or so ago, it became absolute drivel, writing more about the porn industry and the anguish of non-citizens than Americans themselves. They ceased to care about normal Angelenos; only the “marginalized” were featured. We all care about each other, but we also care for our loved ones and the future of our state. The Los Angeles Times doesn’t.
Take their latest article, “If men could get pregnant, abortion and baby formula would be free.” There’s so much wrong with this. They first published an inflamatory photo to create maximum outrage. Is it really necessary to watch a baby being raped by a bearded, hairy man? That’s not nature—that’s just wrong.
Second, many men are not pro-abortion, and a huge number would fight any attempt to make it “free.” The idea that in a world where men could get pregnant, all of us would automatically endorse ending our pregnancies is repugnant. I’m a father, and I consider the gift of my children to be the most profound thing in my life.
The third reason is that men consume gas. Gas is expensive. We use it to power our lawnmowers, drive our hated SUVs, and power our generators, which keeps our families safe during blackouts (increasingly common in Gavin Newsom’s ultra-wealthy state of California).
Is gas free? It is not. No, despite the LA Times bestowing magical powers upon we of the masculine persuasion, gas prices are through the freakin’ roof. What happened to my magic man-power?!
I know a lot of people have posted pictures like this, but it’s still shocking. Two weeks ago it was “only” $80 to fill up. I’ve had this car for a while now and remember paying $40 just a few years ago. Thanks, Joe! pic.twitter.com/O9Cd51uKis
— Bob Hoge (@Bob_Hoge_CA) May 9, 2022
Men like beer, too—is it free? Nope. Guns? Prices have gone to Pluto—if you can get one. Let’s see, I just need to hit the button on our secret man-ring to bring them down.
Another suggestion from the columnist is:
More important, I think we can all agree that if the specter of unwanted pregnancy haunted men’s lives as it does women’s — and if men’s bodies, particularly their sex organs, were in danger of being radically and permanently transformed by childbirth — birth control would be free and abortion federally funded.
Are you really assuming that men don’t pay any price? That’s it’s all fun and games, and the mother is the only one having to make sacrifices? Yes, but we also worry. One of the key indicators to future success is having a father in your home. Our role is to support and, yes, we are sorry, feminists. Provide We are sperm donors for our family. We are not sperm donors, as stated in these articles. Maybe don’t sleep with us if you don’t think we’re dad material.
The article concludes by stating that baby formula shortages are again due to ineffectual men.
But then the unborn really are the perfect constituents for political and religious leaders who can’t be bothered with actual people; it’s easy to demand rights for those who require literally nothing of society. As soon as they hit the open air, however … well, if there is no baby formula, let them eat cake.
Might I point out that the baby formula shortage is not due to men in general, it’s due to one man in particular: Joe Biden, whose policies have created shortages across the spectrum and harmed the nation, perhaps irreparably? Will this LA Times columnist try to claim that Donald Trump is responsible for the current shortage in baby formula? The survey says YES.
Why is there such a sudden interest in formula for babies? If the baby were just a few months younger, you’d be advocating for ending its life.
This nation was once host to some of the world’s greatest newspapers—The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, and yes even the Los Angeles Times. The exception of perhaps the Wall Street Journal has seen almost all these newspapers become hate-filled and shameful arms of Democratic National Committee.
You are not credible if you publish a photograph of a woman breastfeeding an unborn baby in your main story.
About Post Author
You may also like
-
The Art of Negotiation – How Attorney John Coco Transforms Insurance Roadblocks into 7-Figure Settlements
-
How to Transition from a Work Visa to Permanent Residency in the U.S.
-
A Relaxing Path to Your Dream Home
-
How an Auto Accident Attorney Can Help You Navigate the Legal Process
-
Changing Consumer Behavior in the Auto Industry