American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten said she’s happy that NewsGuard highly rates some news outlets that have been critical of her. And her group’s new partner was right by her side.
During a webinar Thursday, she and NewsGuard CEO Steven Brill weren’t even willing to answer a question about their clear left-skewed political leanings.
Brill and Weingarten praised their partnership. The partnership aims to “help” K-12 students “navigate a sea of online disinformation,” according to an announcement. Although Weingarten was on the same stage as Terry McAuliffe, the Virginia Democratic governoral candidate, they portrayed their partnership as trustworthy and neutral. Glenn Youngkin won in November.
Appearing on C-SPAN last week, Brill said, “I am not in favor of banning anything.”
Given Weingarten’s transparent partisanship and the formation of the new partnership, MRC asked the two executives how anyone can take NewsGuard’s claims of neutrality seriously.
They totally ignored the question, even as they answered several questions posted in the Zoom Q&A chat.
NewsGuard and AFT are not politically neutral, contrary to Brill’s and Weingarten’s assertions.
An MRC study found that Brill’s NewsGuard gave “right” or “lean right” news content an average score of 66 percent, but gave “left” or “lean left” content an average score of 93 percent.
Weingarten has tirelessly asked schools to make it mandatory that all K-12 students receive COVID-19 shots in order for them to return to school. Her suggestion was to have schools close for a longer period of time after the pandemic began.
Brill recited Democratic talk points during the webinar.
When NewsGuard started in 2018, “we thought most of what we were going to do had to do with political, uh, misinformation,” Brill said. “We didn’t know about ‘Stop the Steal’ then, but there was all this political misinformation, Russian propaganda, and yeah, there’s a lot of that stuff as we’re seeing in spades today. But by far the largest category of misinformation, and arguably the most dangerous, has to do with health care.”
On its website, NewsGuard brags that it feeds the World Health Organization reports highlighting “top COVID and vaccine myths circulating across the major social platforms.”
MRC reported last month that NewsGuard rating strongly favored Planned Parenthood’s abortion, but gave negative ratings to three prolife news outlets.
Given that abortion involves the death of babies born to an unborn baby, this is not a good way to promote credible information about health.
Also on the health front, Weingarten lamented that “anti-vaxx” group Children’s Health Defense, headed by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., “attacked” NewsGuard’s ties to Big Pharma in a Feb. 28 blog critical of the NewsGuard-AFT partnership.
The post links to marketing materials that note the health division of Publicis Groupe, a major early funder for NewsGuard in 2018, boasted “13 of the top 20 global pharmaceutical companies” as clients.
However, it’s also worth noting that Publicis Groupe divested its health care division in 2019.
“If there’s anyone who has been viewed as an enemy of Big Pharma, it’s you,” Weingarten hailed Brill.
Brill then pivoted the conversation to talk about alleged health “misinformation,” “anti-vaxx decisions plaguing the world,” and so-called 5G conspiracy theories. U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy for calling out alleged health care “misinformation” as a big obstacle, and he complained that programmatic ad revenue had contributed to alternative COVID-19 narratives. Brill then used rhetorical attacks on Kennedy.
“The really good news about the internet is that anybody can be a publisher. You know, any teacher, you know, in this audience who has an important thought or an important contribution, you know, can be a publisher,” Brill said. “The really bad news about the internet is that anybody can be a publisher, and anybody is a publisher. And if your name is Kennedy, uh, you get a lot of attention, which is just really sad and is a whole ‘nother sad story about that.”
Weingarten flimsily attempted to distinguish NewsGuard’s role from her and Brill’s politics earlier in the discussion.
“There’s lots of journals who have actually criticized me quite a bit that get a [positive rating] on NewsGuard, and I’m glad that, um, that there’s a tool that actually does this,” Weingarten said. “That question is precisely one of the reasons why we are trying to separate out political ideology from what is and isn’t factual.”
The problem is that politics is embedded in NewsGuard’s framework and in AFT’s leadership.
Conservatives under attackYour representatives should be contacted to demand transparency and a mirroring of the First Amendment by Big Tech. We can help you if your information has been blocked. Contact the Media Research Center Contact formHelp us to hold Big Tech responsible.