Dog Attack Laws

Dogs’ sharp teeth can cause serious injuries. Some states have laws which hold owners strictly liable when their vicious or dangerous dogs bite someone without provocation, causing injuries.

An indication that a dog is potentially dangerous may include excessive barking or aggressive behavior. Following any attack, state authorities typically hold hearings to examine both the owner and animal for potential liability issues.


Some states have laws that hold owners liable regardless of any knowledge they may have about a dog’s tendency for aggression (strict liability laws), while most others allow for the defense of provocation to be raised against bite claims. Provocation could involve something as simple as stepping on its tail or entering its personal space or petting while eating can provoke the animal into attacking.

Issues at hand for courts include considering both parties involved – victim and dog alike. Furthermore, their must also be consideration as to whether an action was intentional or unintentional – very young children do not possess enough understanding to realize that their actions might provoke a dog and therefore do not have this defense available to them.

Judges or juries may take into account a dog’s temperament when making decisions about alleged dog harassment cases. A reactive, oversensitive canine that reacts violently even at slight provocation could likely be found not guilty.


Dog bites or attacks that result in serious physical injuries to people can often result in death, permanent and severe disfigurement, impairment of health, or prolonged loss or impairment of organ function.

Dogs frequently attack small children because they perceive them to be threats to their territory or intruders on their domain. Other victims could include delivery workers conducting business on an owner’s property or anyone invited onto it by that owner – such as friends.

Strict liability laws typically allow victims of dog attacks to recover compensation by showing evidence proving both that the dog had vicious tendencies and that its owner knew about them. A lawyer must collect evidence, including records detailing any prior aggression or dangerous behaviors displayed by the animal. Furthermore, neighbors who may have witnessed lunging attacks from this dog should also be interviewed as they may provide insight into its prior violent tendencies.


Damages for victims in many states with dog bite laws depend on two areas of law: common law tort principles and state statutory statutes. Victims can file negligence suits against dog owners even if the animal only jumped on or scratched them without biting; then these owners will be held liable for their injuries caused to victims by dogs that did not bite.

However, if the individual who was attacked was on the owner’s property illegally (such as to commit a crime), or they provoked their dog with something painful or disturbing to its senses ( such as by taunting with objects that make the animal uncomfortable), provocation will protect their dog from liability for attacking them; provocation is considered a valid defense in states with strict liability rules.

Damages available to victims include medical costs and lost wages, as well as compensation for their pain and suffering, which includes mental an emotional trauma caused by being attacked.


Dog bite statutes provide victims with compensation by establishing owner liability for injuries caused by their pet, while many laws include both one-bite rules and general negligence provisions for owners who negligently manage or restrain their dogs.

Victims must demonstrate that a dog was abnormally dangerous and its owner knew of its aggressive tendencies to collect compensation from its owner. Furthermore, an injured party must prove that the animal violated a specific legal obligation such as being leashed or within a fence enclosure.

New York state dog bite laws combine the one-bite rule with strict liability to hold owners of previously adjudicated dangerous or vicious dogs strictly liable for medical costs should their animal bite. For other damages, victims must prove the animal had vicious tendencies that were known by its owner in order to recover compensation from him/her.

About Post Author

Follow Us