Different Types of Leadership Strategies
On the surface, we could believe that certain leadership styles are superior to others. Each leadership style has a place in a leader’s toolset; the fact is. When the occasion calls for it, a savvy leader understands shifting from one type to another.
There is a spectrum of leadership styles, ranging from authoritarian to coaching, with several types in between.
A visionary leader is committed to bringing their team together to achieve a shared objective. They put a significant emphasis on motivating workers and forming a robust corporate relationship around their goal.
A leader with a vision
This hands-off leadership style usually does not lay out particular requirements instead of focusing on the company’s overall aim. Visionary leaders, on the other hand, inspire their people to develop their methods. Fast-growing, smaller businesses benefit the most from this sort of leadership.
According to Jonathan Osler, a visionary leader ensures that the vision is realized by declaring clear objectives, laying out a strategic plan to achieve those goals, and equipping and enabling each team member to put the plan into action at the organization, team, and individual levels.
Leadership style of a servant
Servant leaders think that when team members are personally and professionally satisfied, they are more productive and more likely to provide excellent work consistently. They have a greater degree of respect because they place a premium on employee happiness and cooperation.
Servant leadership is effective in businesses of all sizes and industries, but it is most prominent in NGOs. These sorts of leaders excel at boosting employee morale and assisting employees in re-engaging with their jobs.
Servant leaders may increase staff loyalty and productivity, promote employee growth and decision-making, foster trust, and produce future leaders.
Leadership Style: Autocratic
Autocratic leadership, often known as authoritarian leadership, is a kind of management in which the supervisor has complete power over all workplace choices. Team members are not questioned for their opinions; instead, they are expected to follow their leader’s judgments and commands.
Autocratic leadership, like all other management leadership styles, has its benefits. Authoritarian leadership has the advantage of saving time in the decision-making process, ensuring that every member of the team knows precisely what is expected of them and how they are to perform, and reducing strategy implementation errors.
When you lead with a teaching manner, a person is more likely to take a “consider this” approach. People are seen as a reservoir of potential to be developed by a leader who coaches. The leader who brings a coach approach aims to help individuals reach their full potential.
Leaders that use a coaching approach offer their hearts and doors to others. They believe that everyone has personal power. A coaching leader provides individuals with some guidance to help them reach their maximum potential.
Jonathan Osler states that coaching leadership combines coaching attitudes and behaviors, resulting in the highest-performing leadership style. It is accomplished through releasing and empowering potential. This is in contrast to the typical command and control management approach, which may frequently suffocate potential.