Many DC center-right organizations are still cashing Leftist Big Tech checks.
And part of what Big Tech gets for its money: these center-right groups defending Big Tech’s government cronyism and silencing of center-right people and things.
Full disclosure: I’m friends with many people in a lot of these groups. It is REALLY disappointing — and nauseating.)
What is the greatest gift of cronyism to government? Section 230 for Big Tech:
“Speaking of unfair…behold Section 230. This gives Big Tech companies broad amnesty against libel and slander as well as intellectual property lawsuits that result from third-party actions.
“This is anti-Fourteenth Amendment un-equal protection before the law — that no one else in the history of the country has ever received.
“If I owned a small neighborhood bar, I would have to purchase liability insurance to protect me should one third-party patron punch another third-party patron in my place. Or I would have to go to court and convince a judge or jury that it took place in my place — but not because of my place.
“Why do the biggest and richest companies in the history of Planet Earth get government-imposed blanket third-party-action immunity?
“And perhaps the most nauseating part of it is? These center-right groups – continue to pretend Big Tech isn’t Leftist. And that Big Tech isn’t over and over and over again silencing conservatives.”
Why did Big Tech become so big? Massive Government Cronyism – Like Section 230
The reason we can’t seem to get this monster cronyism reversed? Because so many center-right groups are on the Big Tech payroll — and are suddenly champions of massive cronyism for the hugest companies in the history of the world.
Conservative Big Tech Campaign Based On Myths And Misunderstanding
“Section 230 is not contingent on politically neutral content moderation, is not a subsidy or special privilege, nor does it make a distinction between publishers and platforms.”
Ummm…what? “Is not a subsidy or special privilege?!?” Are your frigging kidding me? If my bar can get sued for third-party actions — and Big Tech can’t? That is absolutely “a subsidy or special privilege.”
Nick Sandmann is the perfect example of how ridiculous Section 230 really is. He was the MAGA-hating high-school kid, who was maligned by every Big Media outlet and Big Tech company on the planet.
Sandmann is currently suing nearly every Big Media company. But he can’t even file against Big Tech — because of Section 230. This is ABSURD.
Let me just say that Section 230 is not actually needed.
YouTube would remove a whole movie I had illegally uploaded. The movie house would contact YouTube — and YouTube would pull the movie. And then the movie house would never, never sue YouTube – because YouTube pulled the film.
Even if they did sue the movie company, 99.5 percent of all existing judges would dismiss their ridiculous case. Because most people with an IQ above nine know that YouTube isn’t responsible for third-party actions – so long as they reverse the offending third-party actions.
Section 230 is therefore not required.
What are We the People receiving in return for the massive and unconstitutional Big Tech corruption? The massive and monstrous suppression of the people on the left. Here’s some more nonsense from the center-right Big Tech payroll….
Section 230 and Internet Freedom
“Instead of undermining Section 230, lawmakers should celebrate the role of these long-standing liability protections in creating a free, vibrant marketplace of ideas.”
Ummm…what? “A free, vibrant marketplace of ideas?!?” Are you frigging kidding me?
This is so much gaslighting — they all should have long ago run out of gas.
Here are five HUGE examples of Big Tech crushing conservatives online -– just from a twelve-month period before and after the 2020 election.
Big Tech is part the all-encompassing Anti-Free Speech Enforcer Network, which silences any conservatives who challenge or contradict the constantly-evolving, always-changing Covid Prevailing Narative. Or on everything and anything else, the Prevailing Narative.
Here’s a question: Why do ALL of Big Tech’s erroneous suspensions and bans — only happen to conservatives? I ran Web searches for “Twitter accidentally suspends” and “Facebook accidentally suspends” — and the results are an avalanche of center-right Big Tech victims.
And VERY often, yesterday’s “misinformation” that gets conservatives banned — is tomorrow’s revealed facts…when the truth finally breaks through the Enforcer Network. If it doesn’t. It does most of the time not.
This is just one example. Big Tech suspended multiple accounts in the name of stopping the spread of “misinformation” — to silence the completely accurate October 2020 Hunter Biden laptop story. By the time Big Tech started reversing their “errors” — the November 2020 presidential election had been egregiously and permanently altered.
We now have Robert Malone. Who is absolutely the principal man responsible for most of the vaccines from the last two-plus decades — including the COVID vaccines.
‘Single Most Qualified’ mRNA Expert Speaks About Vaccine Risks
Dr. Malone has been questioning the healthfulness and efficacy of the COVID vaccines — and thus the government mandates therefore.
Malone is considered the godfather of vaccinations. He is the absolute last person on the planet anyone can seriously accuse of being “anti-vaccine.”
Except for the Prevailing Narrative enforcers, who are actually doing just that.
Dr. Robert Malone Goes Full Anti-Vaccine Conspiracist
Big Tech hasn’t taken Doctor Malone’s heresy very well:
“The man who invented the mRNA technology used in some coronavirus vaccines says he was censored by YouTube for sharing his concerns on the vaccines in a podcast.”
YouTube is owned by Google (Market Capital: $1.92 Trillion). Did Big Tech’s silencing stop there? Heavens, no.
LinkedIn Removes the Account of an mRNA Vaccines Inventor to Warn About The Risks of COVID-19 Shots
LinkedIn is owned and managed by Microsoft (Market Cap $2.51 trillion).
Twitter suspends Dr. Robert Malone as a pioneer in mRNA after raising alarm over COVID’s dangers
After he warned against taking COVID Jabs, the inventor of mRNA technology was removed from Wikipedia
And of course: It ain’t just Big Tech enforcing the Prevailing Narrative.
The New England Journal of Medicine bans the inventor of mRNA
There is no one at any Big Tech company — or in government — within a million miles of being as qualified to speak on vaccines as is Dr. Malone.
But he violated the Left’s Prevailing Narrative — so he is being rendered a digital non-person by Big Tech.
And the center-right groups on the Big Tech payroll — are STILL defending Big Tech, its censorship, and its massive cronyism.
This is just so absurd.
About Post Author
