CNN+ Guest Delivers Uncomfortable Coup de Grace to Brian Stelter During Live Broadcast – Opinion

The dunking on CNN over the abject failure of their month-old “CNN+” venture to gain traction after months of promos and attempts at practically giving away subscriptions is still going on as we speak, while employees of the soon-to-be-shut down streaming service are still trying to put on their best faces on social media.

However, the broadcast was live on their chief Media Hall monitor correspondent Brian Stelter’s “Reliable Sources Daily” program Friday, the dunking came from an unexpected source – a guest on the show who Stelter had invited on so they could both talk about Thursday’s announcement and make lame excuses for why CNN’s much-touted paid version bombed so badly, and so quickly.

But the guest, Puck News founding partner Matt Belloni, at one point during the show didn’t seem to want to play along. In response to Stelter asking Belloni if he’d “ever seen anything like this happen before,” Belloni’s response was to note that he himself might have been making history at that very moment by going on a program to talk about “the demise of that program.”



Stelter’s response was to chuckle awkwardly before noting that they likely have more viewers now than they did before because people were curious to see The aftermath of the train crashWhat the reporters and anchors had to say. He then quickly pivoted to some pretty heavy-duty gaslighting and excuse-making, proclaiming that “it’s too early” to learn if the flailing streaming service “was a success or a failure”:

“It’s too early to know if this product and this service was a success or a failure. You know you’ve got all the haters today saying this thing was a failure. I don’t know we can even ever assess that because it just simply didn’t have enough time because of the management’s change in direction.”


The word “delusional” comes to mind watching that clip, because there really is no other way to describe it.

As we’ve discussed here before, conservatives were quick to point out months ago that the writing was on the wall for the eventual failure of CNN+ well before it officially launched at the end of March. After all, the ratings for CNN itself were in a freefall – still are, in fact, with no end in sight. How could they realistically have expected to succeed in getting consumers excited about their content enough to make them pay for monthly subscriptions?

Flashback–>> LOL: CNN+ ‘Help’ Twitter Account Proves Far More Entertaining Than Actual Streaming Service

About Post Author

Follow Us