In stifling free speech and individual rights as well as the right to peaceful assembly, California’s legislature is following in Nancy Pelosi’s footsteps. Californians have protested in their communities and at the capitol, especially those who support free speech and assembly. From the People’s Convoy, to Kayakers for Climate Change, to protests against the “Infanticide Bill” (AB 2223), the exercise of civil liberties has only increased, especially on the constitutional conservative and pro-life end of things.
That is why it is particularly disturbing that a bill that would replicate the January 6 committee’s ideals, and target groups that use patriotic speech and participate in protests in their efforts to seek redress from the government has flown under the radar, and is on course to be voted into law.
NTD News
California Democrats appear to be using the Jan. 6 hearings in Washington D.C. as a catalyst to push legislation aimed at targeting the tax-exempt status of patriot groups in the state. The legislation suggests these groups might pose a threat of “insurrection.”
Senate Bill 834 would authorize state Attorney General Rob Bonta to review non-profit groups and refer cases to the California Franchise Tax Board to possibly remove their tax-exempt status supposedly to protect against “insurrection.”
San Francisco Senator Scott Wiener (D- for Deviant), is the primary author of this bill <*Surprise!*>.
Wiener believes strongly that targeting other people’s children is what will make his career. This belief does not seem to be outlandish, considering he is the San Francisco Cabal member along with Rep. Eric Swallwell (D–FangFang).
Wiener co-authored the bill that is now law. It lowers the age at which sexual consent can be given by 10 years. That means that a adult of 25 may have sex in public with a teenager aged 15 without having to worry about being accused or put on the list. Another of Wiener’s bills that is raising hackles, SB 866, is focused on eliminating parental consent for children 12 and older, so that they can be vaccinated.
Wiener drafted this idea to make a bill in response to the outrage that children were allowed to attend Pride months Drag Queen shows.
The guy gave me an idea for a bill:
Offer Drag Queen 101 to the K-12 Curriculum. The requirement can be fulfilled by attending Drag Queen Story Time. https://t.co/Sogz2Ag8jV
— Senator Scott Wiener (@Scott_Wiener) June 7, 2022
Wiener doesn’t qualify as a dog catcher nor as a state senator.
We are still here.
I read every bill, and actively fought for them (and other)
Weiner is not childless but targets children by his fetishization disguised as “legislative legislation”.
Lowering consent, lower sex related victimization penalties… sick.— Andi HK (@AndiHK) June 8, 2022
The bill, authored by state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), would empower the attorney general to determine whether or not a non-profit organization “has actively engaged in, or incited the active engagement in, acts or conspiracies” and require the attorney general to notify the California Franchise Tax Board—the state equivalent of the IRS—to revoke the tax-exempt status of any organization found to be in violation.
SB 834 was approved by the Senate 28-12 on May 23. The Assembly Appropriations Committee approved it, and the bill was then moved Tuesday to the Assembly Public Safety Committee. The Assembly will vote on it if they pass.
Sen. Wiener told the committee the intent of the bill is to expand the California Franchise Tax Board’s authority “to revoke the tax-exempt status of nonprofits if the attorney general determines that the nonprofit has engaged in or incited various crimes including treason, insurrection, and seditious conspiracy.”
So essentially, it’s “The Minority Report,” only instead of targeting pre-crime, it’s targeting pre-insurrection.
If we weren’t sure before, it is now fully confirmed: Californians are living in a dystopian nightmare.
Wiener wants to broaden the Calif. Attorney General powers through the state’s Franchise Tax Board. The idea is that Rob Bonta, the current AG of California would have the ability to accomplish what President Obama did in 2012. Obama used the IRS as a weapon against Tea Party conservatives. Bonta could use the FTB to attack Patriot groups.
It is chilling, but that’s how outrageous this senator and his ideas seem. It is also indicative of how far the Democrat Supermajority goes to push its agenda—because it can. These progressive legislators were among the ones who watched the Joke-6 hearings, and they believe that this absurdity is changing minds and hearts. These legislators have now concluded that Pelosi’s plan on Capitol Hill was good policy for Sacramento.
What exactly does Wiener consider, “active engagement” in “acts or conspiracies”? What will it take to determine this? Perhaps even better: WhoWill this be the case? Is it the state legislature A rando Wiener meets on the streets?
As per usual with the bills that the California legislature excretes, other than the stench, like one of Swallwell’s farts, they are devoid of any actual substance. Who will be responsible for this? Is it possible to remove tax-exempt status from taxpayers? The most crucial thing is that no one has the answer or question to this: How will this affect Californians?
It is likely that the Joke-6 benefits American citizens in as great a way as it does: One. Bit.
Wiener needs to clarify whether Antifa, or BLM, will be tax exempted. Patrisse, the founder of BLM, and her multi-house scam have already broken tax laws. Since 2020, both groups have caused untold violence and destruction, and with the help of California’s woke D.A.s, have committed acts that fall under sedition, and have destroyed any notion of public safety. You can ask Republican Lt. Angela Jacobs Underwood was the Governor Candidate. Angela’s brother was attacked by BLM in Oakland while he guarded an Oakland Courthouse.
So, if passed into law, will BLM and Antifa be test cases for SB 834, or will the law only target groups that progressives don’t like?
Blatantly violating federal laws is another issue. Although the Franchise Tax Board relies on state business filings in California to create a California non-profit entity, they do not have any control over tax exempt status. The Internal Revenue Service has sole authority to decide if the entity is tax-exempt.
State law governs nonprofit status, which is determined by an organization’s articles of incorporation or trust documents. The tax-exempt status can be governed by the federal law. Exemption from Federal Income Tax is specifically defined in the Internal Revenue Code.
So, any attempt to executive this law is not only a violation of these tax-exempt group’s First Amendment rights, but of federal tax law. This would make sense if someone who claims to be an attorney has done research.
However, judging by the track record and achievements of Governor Hair Gel Newsom and this legislature, it seems that the only things that are important to them is grandstanding and virtue signaling. They also want to strip Californians of their rights.
About Post Author
