Traditional marriage. A union between a woman and a man. It is a gift of God that some people receive.
Now, in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s majority 5-4 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, terrified Democrats are scurrying to head off what they are certain will be the Court’s next ruling — an overturn of the federal right to same-sex marriage.
The Democratic legislators were certain that there was a cogent opinion during the election. RoeJustice Clarence Thomas overturned the decision, urging that cases relating to contraception or same-sex marriage be re-examined by the Court.
So, what’s a group of left-wingers, who in June voted in the Senate (49 of 50 Democrats) in support of Up to three months on-demand abortion to do? Pass legislation in the House — joined by 47 Republicans — under which the federal government would recognize any marriage legally performed in any of the 50 states.
This is not to be taken lightly, but to push this idea to the logical limit.
According to There are many reasons to be cheerful in October 2021, legal systems around the world — including in America — are beginning to confront an existential question: What rights does an animal have? Valid question. As is the case for everything, crazy on Planet Looney Tunes, a movement is underway to give “personhood” to animals, including under the law.
So, let’s extrapolate. Keep in mind that the Democrat-passed House bill would require the federal government, should it become a law, to recognize marriages if they are recognized. Any of the 50 US states can legally perform it. Let’s assume that, oh, California, for example, passes a law giving “personhood” rights to, say dogs (you know where this is going, right?). Let’s further assume that the no-longer-Golden State then passes a law legalizing marriage between a person and a dog — again, a logical extreme, solely to illustrate a point.
Under the Democrats’ so-called Respect for Marriage Act, which was introduced by New York’s despicable Democrat Representative Jerry Nadler — the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, no less — the federal government would not only be forced to recognize that marriage; the attorney general of the United States would be able to file lawsuits against states that refuse to recognize the marriage as well.
Are you sure that the scenario I just described is possible? No. Do I also believe there’s NothingI would be surprised if the rabid Left could accomplish that. Yes, indeed.
CNN reports that in addition to protecting the rights to same-sex marital relationships nationwide, the Democrat bill includes federal protections of interracial marriages. It again states that a marriage must also be recognized as federal law if legalized in the jurisdiction where it occurred.
House Majority Leader Steny Hogue, another Democrat with impeccable character [sarcasm]According to CNN transcriptions, “” was said by the candidate in a statement regarding the election.
It is critical to ensure that federal law protects those whose constitutional rights might be threatened by Republican-controlled state legislatures. LGBTQ Americans and people in inter-racial marriages should have the certainty that they will have equal marriage rights no matter where or when they move.
Stoyer couldn’t be reached to comment about the Constitution rights for babies. murdered until Right before the birth.
A funny note: South Carolina Republican Representative Nancy Mace was one of 47 Republicans to support the bill via Twitter
Just passed out the Respect for Marriage Act. I’m a big fan of marriage, having done it a few times. I’m all for gay couples being happy and lovingly married to their straight partners. This is what I believe.
Nicely played, congresswoman — although your vote was not.
Just passed out the Respect for Marriage Act. I’m a big fan of marriage, having done it a few times. I’m all for gay couples being happy and lovingly married to their straight partners. This is what I believe. ❤️🇺🇸
— Nancy Mace (@NancyMace) July 19, 2022
RedState Related:
Whoopi Goldberg Is Either a Hyperbolic Liar or a Perfect Example of the Left’s Ignorance
Kamala Harris shares the thoughts of God about abortion from a respected religious scholar
Elena Kagan Claims ‘Legitimacy’ of Supreme Court Is at Risk When It Strays From Public Opinion
About Post Author
