On Wednesday, the Home Committee on Oversight and Reform held a listening to with gun producers referred to as “Inspecting the Practices and Income of Gun Producers.” You’ll be able to inform proper off the bat that this was a Democratic effort to demonize gun producers. Lots of people are killed with knives, however for some motive, we by no means see any issues expressed about knife producers.
However if you add in Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) — she who pretended to be handcuffed throughout an arrest stunt — you already know that you just’re going to appreciably add to the ridiculous nature of the dialogue. She acquired ripped aside by a Democratic NY state senator for that efficiency stunt, whereas not being current in her personal district.
On this video, AOC tried to smear the Daniel Protection firm as one way or the other racist due to a random tattoo somebody in one in every of their advertisements had, attempting to assert they have been “that includes” a “white supremacist” image. She consults one other witness, who claims it’s a white supremacist image.
Actress @AOC (D-Broadway) spends 6 minutes arguing gun producers goal “white supremacist” actions b/c of a tattoo she noticed in an advert pic.twitter.com/c8x2YXpp3L
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) July 27, 2022
It’s even exhausting to see what they’re referencing — a lot much less to assert that it’s “featured.” However what it’s (and what the opposite witness seems to mispronounce), is a valknut image that’s related to Odin and Norse mythology.
Simply because Sampson stated it was a white supremacy image doesn’t make it so. A easy Google search can clarify the assorted meanings. pic.twitter.com/dK003qcvJd
— jessicalong (@kukalong) July 27, 2022
Whereas the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) notes that some racists have used the image, additionally they notice that different people who find themselves not racist have used it as effectively, in order that they warning folks from simply leaping to the conclusion that it’s racist.
However that’s precisely what AOC was doing right here, not solely defaming the random man on this image and who is aware of what number of different folks by this assault, but in addition defaming the gun firm.
And what does Daniel Protection should do with Jan. 6? AOC simply inserts a random image of the QAnon Shaman man in there, who has nothing to do with Daniel Protection. Then she wouldn’t even let Mr. Daniel reply, after she lays such a nonsensical assault on him. She asks him questions, however then instantly cuts him off in a clear try to not let him communicate.
AOC continues with nonsense about Palmetto State Armory and a flowery gun, which she claims is one way or the other related to the Boogaloo Bois, who she calls right-wing. I don’t know the way you make that leap in regards to the design on the gun, however Boogaloo are usually not “right-wing” — they’re anti-government folks, and lots of of them stood with the BLM through the 2020 riots.
However that is what the Democrats have deteriorated to at this level — that is clown-world sort questioning. They’ll defame anybody in the event that they assume that particular person one way or the other stands in the way in which of their agenda.
So, I’ve questions on this image of AOC. She’s flashing what some leftists assume is a “white energy image.”
— shannon (@srbfen1) July 27, 2022
She will’t attempt to argue this away, proper? As a result of the left has advised us that white supremacists have appropriated this image. I feel she wants to clarify this to us.
Now, after all, it isn’t a white energy image, however that’s the place they’re at with the loopy.
About Post Author
