WASHINGTON — A day after Robby Molok, Hillary Clinton’s head of 2016 election campaign, indicted her in a plot to connect Donald Trump with a Russian bank in 2016, I was unable to find mention of this in any of the major newspapers in the Republic. The Wall Street Journal. The Journal did a good job covering Mook’s testimony before a federal judge. But, I did look through. The New York Times And The Washington Post Mook’s testimonies were not found with the legendary depth of my research. It’s not in the Help Wanted or Style sections.
The Journal reported Mook’s testimony as follows in page A4 of its first paragraph: Hillary Clinton approved that research was done in months prior to the 2016 election. It purported to prove a link between her GOP opponent, Donald Trump, the Russian bank. Robby Mook, Robby Mook’s presidential campaign manager, testified Friday. The Times said this on Saturday about an important piece of information: “(Nothing.]” It was said The PostSaturday, “(Nothing.”)” I’d like a full refund if I was a subscriber to either paper. I might even want to change papers. The JournalTo or from The Washington TimesThe report was published on Monday by, but it does not appear Saturdays or Sundays.
Since years, this is how the Clinton news has been reported. A few newspapers may report on a Clinton scandal, while the rest of media remains silent for days, weeks, months, or even years. After that, the Clintons’ Episodic Appologists would awaken for about a month before going to sleep again. When the Whitewater scandals occurred, I made a quick trip to New York City to check out the media and see if anyone knew anything about the scandal. The Clintons are notorious for scandals that have been circulating for over 40 years. Some knew about the scandal. Many weren’t. They weren’t kidding. They really were in the dark, until The Times broke the story. After that it was okay for the Newsroom dolts to mention the fact.
You can see the episodic appologists at work in their best amnesia example right here. The American SpectatorTroopergate Stories. In late 1993 we published our first Troopergate article about Arkansas troopers conspiring to support Clinton. The media didn’t say anything until I forced the Los Angeles Times into publishing their story. After that, the papers sat on their stories for days and largely covered up the Clintons. For the media to finally admit defeat, it took several years, perhaps even decades. Even the mentions they made were a direct attack on the messenger. The American Spectator, that is.
We are yet to hear the Robby Mook tale. Mook was in court Friday to testify on behalf Michael Sussmann. Sussmann is an accused Clinton lawyer. Mook claimed that “I discussed it” (the disclosure of dubious information) with Hillary. However, I do believe we discussed it after the fact and reached a mutual decision. Mook continued, “Actually, it was discussed that we had this and wanted to share with a journalist.” He agreed. He was honest. It’s difficult to believe he would lie. Sussmann defends against claims by the FBI that he lied about his information to them. Sussmann is charged with billing the Clinton campaign for this piece dubious information. Prosecution claims to have the proof for this claim.
This Sunday The Post A piece was submitted by the author, which reviewed all of what transpired last week in courtroom. The TimesShe remained neutral. The PostIt lasted over a full page. The article mentioned Elon Musk and Michael Sussmann. It is not clear why it included Musk. This was done to obscure issues. Please let me know if Musk played a role in last week’s courtroom proceedings. My view is that the only questions I care about are: Are Mook and Sussmann being truthful? Mook will be my witness and I’ll wait for a jury to decide on Sussmann. Let’s add another thing. Hillary was once more caught in a lying, the worst lie of her entire career. Hillary tried to win an election.
We will end this on a high note. Ukraine: Glory!
About Post Author
