Ketanji brown Jackson, the nominee for Biden’s Supreme Court is refusing to define. “woman“ because she’s “not a biologist.” Never mind that she supports lax sentences with no legal minimums for child porn offenders. When Ted Cruz, a Texas senator confronted her about Critical Race Theory support she was able to lie her face off.
Remember that Jackson is one of the most radical SCOTUS nominations to have ever appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Her views and positions can be anathematic for conservatives all across America.
Never mind “all of the above,” and more.
According to the Associated Press — self-defined as “the definitive source for independent journalism from every corner of the globe” — the Real reason Republicans oppose KBJ and all she stands for is that she “brings too much empathy to the job.” No, really.
As the AP appears to disappointedly see it, KBJ will not be confirmed with a “robust bipartisan vote.” Okay. After hours of baseless, Democrat attacks against Brett Kavanaugh and later, Amy Coney Barrett, the Republican-controlled Senate confirmed both nominees 50-48 along mainly party lines, so we’re “even.”
The Senate has confirmed Ketanji Jackson, the Supreme Court’s first Black woman, after more than thirty hours of hearings.
However, Democrats are unlikely to support her in a strong bipartisan vote. https://t.co/F4e9UIgt6G
— The Associated Press (@AP) March 25, 2022
The AP then trumpeted KBJ’s Record of academic achievement calling her SCOTUS nomination “long overdue” — totally ignoring her record and experience — before “revealing” the ridiculous “Jackson brings too much empathy to the job” schtick. The real question is: AP? Too much empathy? whom?
Children who are victims of predators or predators? Males who “identify” as females and proceed to kick the hell out of female competitors in women’s sports? Unborn children, or the “birthing person” — I had to toss that in — who chooses abortion over “birthing”? Please, with the “empathy” nonsense.
Democrats praised President Joe Biden’s choice of the Harvard-educated lawyer and appellate court judge as long overdue, making the judicial branch begin to look more like America.
Republicans counter that Jackson lacks empathy for his job. https://t.co/392C6FSXK8
— The Associated Press (@AP) March 25, 2022
And of course, claims AP, this isn’t the first time empathy has “been wielded as a disqualifying weapon against a nominee for the high court.” Make that For women “tapped for the bench,” as opposed to males. Oh, really? What happened the last time it was? Facts, please.
It’s not the first time that empathy has been wielded as a disqualifying weapon against a nominee for the high court. It’s not the first time that the empathy standard has been applied to women who were tapped to serve on the high court bench instead of the longer-listing men. https://t.co/392C6FSXK8
— The Associated Press (@AP) March 25, 2022
Such a fuss by the legacy media over the whole “women” vs. “men” thing — when the SCOTUS nominee herself isn’t qualified to define “woman” because she isn’t a biologist. Liberals. People can be very confusing.
RedState is related to:
Manchin Announces the Decision to Allow Ketanji-Brown Jackson Vote
USA Today continues to claim that science can’t prove what makes a woman a Ketanji.
About Post Author
