Unconfirmed emails, and other degenerate behaviors were discovered on a Hunter Biden laptop in October 2020. That report, originally published and expanded on by The New York Post, was relentlessly censored by social media companies and maligned as “Russian disinformation” by the mainstream media and the Biden campaign.
That didn’t stop right-leaning media from digging deeper, and the revelations were stunning, including Hunter Biden making $80,000 a month from a Ukrainian oil company and receiving a $2 million “retainer” to sell influence to the Libyan government. He also had extensive dealings with China, which at best seemed to be in the category of FARA criminal violations. Hunter Biden is yet to completely divest his part in Chinese-owned venture capital firms.
Still, all of that has been known for a long time, yet the media’s response has been to completely ignore it while the Biden administration has continued to lie about the origins of the emails. This was true up to the past few weeks.
Suddenly, for no reason whatsoever I’m assured, the liberal news industry, including The New York Times and The Washington Post, decided to “confirm” all the reporting we already knew was true. Further, the Post’s write-up goes so far as to detail some of Hunter Biden’s corrupt dealings, specifically regarding the Chinese. That’s quite the about-face.
A Post review of Hunter Biden’s deals with a Chinese energy company confirms key details and offers new documentation https://t.co/bJI401clhJ
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) March 30, 2022
“It seems pretty clear that Hunter Biden was trading on his father’s name to make a lot of money.”
It was amazing to hear such a thing on CNN.
pic.twitter.com/JSKx2f2lmM— Benny (@bennyjohnson) March 30, 2022
I’m not going to waste time breaking down this latest reporting because again, none of it is really new. If you click the hyperlinks I put at the beginning of the article, you’ll see source after source laying out the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s laptop and the corrupt business deals he partook in (and possibly continues to partake in). It is not at all impressive that these major media publications showed up to the party a year and a half late to “confirm” what far more trustworthy outlets had the integrity to report in a timely manner.
We should ask why we read the Times, Post and others. You walked into the office with your six-pack on and your dancing shoes. It is rare that anything, I don’t mean nothing, which could be harmful for a major Democrat is printed accidentally. A report is made when it is, even if the story was suppressed previously.
So what’s going on here? I think one only has to look at the media’s history to see a pattern when it comes to harmful revelations about Democrat figures. When reports start coming out that simultaneously make major admissions but still attempt to white-wash what’s happening, that’s usually because forces within the government are leaking information in order to get out in front of a story and preset the narrative.
The Times and the Post reported on the Carter Page FISA abuse, but only after it became clear much more was about to come out showing the FBI’s abuse of power. The Times and Post both reported John Durham’s indictment of Michael Sussmann. However, this was only to indicate that the indictment wasn’t strong enough. It was much worse than what the Times and Post reported when the indictment actually dropped.
Are you able to see the point I am trying to make? There is something very serious about the corrupt practices of Hunter Biden and possibly his father. That’s why we are getting these reports right now, and that’s why those privy to the FBI investigation into Joe Biden’s son are suddenly leaking like crazy. The goal is to create a narrative that will make it clear how terrible things really were. That means you can take the Post’s newest report and assume it’s just the tip of the iceberg.
I don’t know if the goal here is to throw enough dirt on Joe Biden to get him out of the way for Kamala Harris, or if the press thinks going directly at Hunter Biden will somehow draw a distinction and insulate the White House. What I do know is that this isn’t the end of this story. Keep checking back.
About Post Author
