Media Is Forced to Cover Hunter’s Laptop as Even CNN Teases Interesting Info – Opinion

We’ve been covering the Hunter Biden laptop story for the past two years.

When Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) brought out more information this week about payments to Hunter Biden’s firm from a company that they called an “effective arm” of the Chinese government, this was not new to our readers as we have extensively covered the Biden contacts with China.

Although Republicans have talked about it for years, now the liberal media are reporting on Hunter Biden. They’ve been spinning the story and completely ignoring this topic for most of their time. The Washington Post joined the New York Times to finally report on certain issues. That’s how you know that they know something is coming, they’re just trying to get out in front of it and spin it as best as they can.

ABC, for example, limited it to Hunter Biden’s “tax affairs” although it’s already been made clear by the FBI that the investigation involves many more questions than that. The grand jury was meeting with witnesses and they did not forget about that.

CBS — with investigative reporter Catherine Herridge — had one of the better takes, pointing out some of the other areas being looked into including money laundering and foreign lobbying laws.

The White House claimed that Biden “never considered being in business with family or any business overseas.” This is backpedaling from Joe Biden’s prior claim that he didn’t know anything about his son’s business or his business associates. Why? It was because the laptop revealed what a lie it was.

CNN’s John Harwood tried to save Biden claiming, “There is zero evidence that Vice President Biden, or President Biden, has done anything wrong in connection with what Hunter Biden has done.”

Of course this is false. So we’re supposed to ignore the evidence that we’ve seen in the laptop about Hunter’s business associates getting to meet with Joe Biden when he was Vice President and things like the “10 held by H for the big guy” email? We’re supposed to ignore that Hunter and Joe had shared finances, that Hunter paid bills for Joe, that Hunter’s business associate was intimately involved with Joe Biden’s finances? So what Hunter responded in the CBS report — that his father hadn’t benefitted “directly or indirectly” — is not the case. That’s one of the reasons it isn’t just about Hunter: It’s about comingling, conflicts, and influence peddling, among other things.

CNN teases something interesting in a different report.

Was it something you saw? They’re teasing that the investigation also is looking into who paid off Hunter’s big tax bills recently. That raises interesting questions, particularly if it’s connected to a foreign government and/or if it was paid off in the last year when Joe was in office.

However, the fact that witnesses have been brought before grand juries suggests we might be hearing some news soon.

About Post Author

Follow Us