Kamala Embarrasses Herself Badly With Explanation of Situation in Ukraine – Opinion

I have to admit it’s hard to top Joe Biden for incoherence. But if there’s anyone who comes close, it’s Kamala Harris. They are the perfect couple in that way.

We’ve seen some amazing examples from Harris. This was the instant classic word salad.

We reported that there was a little extra cringe on Monday. It looked like Biden took a swipe at it.

When you say you “got what you asked for,” it’s generally negative. And no, we didn’t ask for all the inflation and incompetence that Biden and Harris have brought.

But now we have another entrant in the Kamala Harris “special moments” sweepstakes. She appeared as a guest on “The Morning Hustle,” where she was asked to explain the Russia-Ukraine conflict in “laymen’s terms.” If you thought that she was going to offer some insightful analysis, you would be wrong.

“So, Ukraine is a country in Europe. It is located next to Russia. Russia is larger than any other country. Russia is an imposing country. Russia chose to invade Ukraine. So basically, that’s wrong.”

It sounds almost like she has a basic understanding of the situation. Is she trying to speak down to Americans who listen to her show? Is this her only insight? In any case, she is in serious trouble.

This is the same line she continued when asked about conflict between Joe Biden and Harris over possible sanctions against Russia that were in place prior to the invasion. Joe Biden said after the invasion that “No one expected the sanctions to prevent anything from happening.” Yet his team — including Harris — had been saying that the sanctions were supposed to deter Putin. Kamala claimed that she believed the threat of sanctions would discourage him. They also asked Kamala about it on-air.

Once again, she responded as though Americans wouldn’t understand what a “deterrent” was and compared it to a parent instructing a child. This is not exactly how a competent person would approach foreign affairs or negotiate with countries. Plus she didn’t explain away the conflict. In fact, she stated again that she believed it would act as a deterrent. But she was mistaken.

We already have Biden talking down to Americans acting like they don’t understand how happy they should be under him because they are “psychologically” upset. We also had House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggesting that Americans were just ignorant of all Biden’s achievements — explaining why they were panning him in the polls — that they needed to be told about all the achievements.

They have no idea what they are doing and they can’t honestly justify it to anyone. So that’s why it comes out as just a mass of confusion or something devoid of any information.

About Post Author

Follow Us