It Takes Tulsi Gabbard Just 20 Seconds to Explain Everything Wrong With Rittenhouse Trial – Opinion

Former Hawaii Congresswoman and 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard has by no means been one to shrink back from wading into sizzling button matters and angering “her aspect” within the course of, and the Kyle Rittenhouse case has been no exception.

As we’ve beforehand reported, the prosecution within the closely-watched trial has executed themselves zero favors over the previous few days, struggling critical setbacks reminiscent of Decide Bruce Schroeder repeatedly admonishing them over their courtroom antics, with inarguably the largest setback being that one of many prosecution’s star witnesses admitted on the stand that Rittenhouse solely shot at him after he (the witness) pointed a gun at him.

However whereas the trial drags on and the particulars are mentioned and debated, one factor that has been made greater than clear from the outset – effectively earlier than the trial even began, in actual fact – is that there by no means ought to have been a trial within the first place.

It is a level Gabbard made eloquently in a 20-second video posted to Twitter yesterday:

“The prosecutor on this Rittenhouse trial clearly didn’t do his due diligence earlier than making the choice to prosecute. This tragedy by no means would have occurred if the federal government had merely carried out its duties to guard the security, lives, and property of harmless individuals.”

Watch:

In my view, it’s an inarguable level that due diligence was not executed on this case. And in addition, that there wouldn’t even be a case in any respect if legislation enforcement had been allowed to do their jobs in Kenosha and different elements of the nation as a substitute of being compelled to take a seat again and watch as town they’ve sworn to guard and serve will get looted and burned to the bottom by offended Antifa/Black Lives Matter-led leftist mobs.

Bear in mind, the Kenosha mobs had been already emboldened by rioters in different Democrat-run cities like Minneapolis who had been allowed to run roughshod and destroy complete communities within the course of as they proclaimed to champion justice for black lives, although the very nature of their “motion” to defund the police truly places black lives in additional hazard. It’s self-defeating, however then once more the unconventional left are notorious for holding such positions, as a result of showing “woke” is outwardly extra essential than sensibly advocating issues that might truly assist the group.

Gabbard, as per the norm, was spot-on in her evaluation. Not surprisingly, she triggered Twitter leftists with the inconvenient truths she dropped, the identical leftists who, I ought to observe, proclaim to be advocates for “felony justice reform” however who outed themselves this week in an enormous method this week by mocking Rittenhouse and demanding he be locked up in jail with the important thing thrown away.

To reiterate a degree I’ve made earlier than, I suppose perhaps for the felony justice reform hypocrites there are exceptions to the “we shouldn’t choose a defendant till all of the information come out” rule – and let’s hope the exception just isn’t primarily based on an individual’s race, as a result of that might imply a few of Rittenhouse’s critics, like outstanding South Carolina Democrat and lawyer Bakari Sellers and Democrat Home chief Hakeem Jeffries are racists.

In any occasion, keep tuned for the most recent developments within the Rittenhouse trial. As all the time, we’ve received you coated.

Flashback: Soledad O’Brien Calls Conflict Veteran Tulsi Gabbard a ‘Coward’ After ‘Current’ Vote and It Does Not Go Effectively

About Post Author

Follow Us