Dana Loesch Schools Jerry Nadler After Insane ‘Mansplaining’ About Female Gun Ownership – Opinion

It never fails to amaze me how it’s usually the same powerful movers and shakers who are protected to the gills with armed security who are also the ones essentially telling the common man and woman that they, on the other hand, don’tYou do not require a firearm or police to defend yourself.

Unfortunately, that is exactly what happened Thursday at a House Judiciary Committee session to markup new legislation created by Jerry Nadler, chair of the committee. Democrats claim it is designed to protect children from gun violence following the massacre at Robb Elementary School, Uvalde Texas, where an 18-year old gunman killed 19 children and injured two teachers.

We reported earlier on how “woke” freshman House Democrat Mondaire Jones went nuts during the committee meeting by tyrannically declaring that Democrats will do whatever it takes, including abolishing the filibuster and expanding the Supreme Court if they needed to in order to pass their gun control bills. However, his New Yorker colleague Nadler didn’t do him any favors.

During the session, Nadler claimed that “There is no research to support the idea that women’s gun ownership increases their safety,” which is literally a talking point straight out of the “Everytown” gun control handbook (which Nadler did not note). Then he cited alleged studies that support his claims, such as one that stated that women who have guns in their homes are less likely to be murdered by their spouses.

Watch:

Popular conservative radio talk show host Dana Loesch, a former spokeswoman for the NRA, immediately slammed Nadler for his insane “mansplaining,” and tweeted out numerous links that prove women who own guns were able to use them to either protect themselves or a loved one from harm:

One Twitter user tried to make sense of Nadler’s argument but couldn’t.

“More women are more likely to be killed by their partners… which is why we need to make sure that women don’t get guns. Wut???” the woman wondered incredulously.

Yet another asked him “really? [Me owning a gun] sure did make my stalker think twice.”

This, of course, isn’t the first time Loesch has ripped into a gun control proponent whose idea of a woman protecting herself is to have her rely (and wait) on someone else. When far-left “journalist” Aaron Rupar smugly suggested in a March 2021 tweet that women in abusive relationships who worried they wouldn’t make it through the night without a gun should just “call the police,” Loesch responded accordingly by pointing out the following inconvenient facts:

“Average response time of police = 10-18 minutes. Protective orders can be considered trash. My gun was there for me when a burglar tried to enter my home. This is the end of this story. Stop disarming women.

Anyone who thinks you can ‘just call the police’ and have them act like your private security clearly has the progressive male privilege of never experiencing abusive situations like this.”

Sadly, Democrat Men are stillTell us about them Really are on this issue while at the same time they’re rushing to the microphones to be counted as the biggest defenders of a “woman’s right” to control her own destiny via abortion or whatever. What a joke – but not a funny one at all.

Flashback: Rep. AOC Runs Away After Dana Loesch Smashes Her ‘Defund the Police’ Argument

About Post Author

Follow Us