Four days after special counsel John Durham revealed new findings in the investigation into the Trump-Russia collision, which states that close associates of Hillary Clinton were monitoring internet traffic at Trump properties and the White House in order to create a “narrative,” CNN En Español broke the Spanish-language media’s silence with a report that downplayed the news as same-old-same-old material hyped by the conservative media.
Juan Carlos Lopez, anchor of the Anchor Juan Carlos Lopez dismisses all things Durham as Trumper garbage. In his closing line, the anchor even preempts the future findings of the investigation:
Directo USA
Tuesday, February 15, 2022 –
JUAN CARLOS LOPEZ, CNNEE: You may have heard a particular version in the media, especially conservative media, which says that the investigating prosecutor John Durham, who was appointed by former Attorney General William Barr to get to the center of the investigation into the alleged contacts between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia. You may have heard about Hillary Clinton’s campaign spying on Trump. Trump said that this would lead to the death penalty. It turns out, that is not the truth. John Durham was the investigating prosecutor.
(….)
Contrary to the claims of conservative media outlets and Trump supporters, Durham was not able to prove that any Trump communications were being interrogated by his campaign. Although the confirmation about the Sussman phone search is not new it has been reported before. It will now be part of the trial. The truth of the claim will then be proven. However, no evidence was presented contrary to headlines about Trump’s campaign or alleged spying.
Lopez’s fixation with the conservative media as evil purveyors of misinformation — rule #1 at CNN — came through right from the beginning: “You may have heard a particular version in the media, especially conservative media,”; and then “Contrary to what conservative media and followers of former President Trump himself say”; and, to wrap it up: “Contrary to the headlines you may have seen..” It appeared that the idea here was to blame everything on conservatives and distract from the real subject in question: Hillary Clinton.
In his staunch defense of the former Secretary of State, Lopez said the new filings will be used in “the process that will follow and The trial will be held and the truth of it will be proven., But they’ve not done anything.Contrary to some headlines about Trump and Clinton’s alleged spying. He is certain that even though all the evidence must be proved in court, nothing will be.
That’s powerful. It is also an exception from the normal when stories were covered for weeks despite having no supporting evidence. One example is Trump’s taxes, and the “suckers-and-losers” hoax.
Reach out to advertisers JeepThis allows the Hispanic media to be biased in a way that makes it appear that news is being relayed accurately. Act now.
About Post Author
You may also like
-
When to Shop and Where to Travel: Seasonal Tips for Savvy Travelers
-
Puerto Rico or Hawaii? Discover the Ultimate Island for Your Vacation
-
Training: A Company’s Most Prized Investment
-
The Benefits of Movable Soundproof Room Dividers: Flexibility, Noise Control, and Sustainable Design
-
What to Do Following an Unfair Workers’ Compensation Denial