Credit: Screen grab
2020 Democrats Call for Brett Kavanaugh to Be Impeached

2020 Democrats Call for Brett Kavanaugh to Be Impeached

UPDATE: This article has been updated to reflect the call by Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate who represents Massachusetts, for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh to be impeached. 

At least two Democratic presidential candidates on Sunday called for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh to be impeached.

The calls came a day after New York Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly said they corroborated one of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearings last year. They also reported a similar allegation, also involving a female Yale University classmate from decades ago, that was previously unknown to the public.

According to the reporters, the new claim was made by nonprofit owner Max Stier to the FBI, but the agency did not investigate it.

MORE: Police Rush to Scene of MAGA ‘Hate Crime’ Against Ex-NFL Player ― Find Him ‘Attacking’ Himself

Sen. Kamala Harris of California said on Twitter that she “sat through those hearings” and they were a “sham.”


“Brett Kavanaugh lied to the U.S. Senate and most importantly to the American people,” she said. “He was put on the Court through a sham process and his place on the Court is an insult to the pursuit of truth and justice. He must be impeached.”

Minutes later, Julian Castro, a former housing and urban development secretary, echoed Harris’ demand. His position marked a rapid escalation from his demand hours earlier for an investigation.


Hours thereafter, Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, tweeted that both Kavanaugh and President Donald Trump should be impeached. Harris and Castro have also said in the past that Trump should be impeached.

Pogrebin and Kelly are set to on Tuesday release a book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” based on a 10-month probe of Kavanaugh’s life at prep-school and Yale. They said they “corroborated Stier’s story with two officials who have communicated with” him.

The Times reporters also said they talked to at least seven people who heard of Ramirez’s account “long before Mr. Kavanaugh was a federal judge,” including two former Yale students who learned of it days after it allegedly occurred.

More calls for the impeachment of Brett Kavanaugh

Harris and Castro joined a number of liberal commentators in demanding Kavanaugh’s impeachment.

Conservatives, meanwhile, expressed irritation with the continued fixation on alleged misbehavior from Kavanaugh’s youth. Some sought to poke holes in the latest reporting.

Trump suggested on Twitter that Kavanaugh “start suing people for libel” or that the Justice Department “come to his rescue.”

Mollie Hemingway, an editor at The Federalist, and Carrie Severino, chief counsel and policy director at the Judicial Crisis Network, accused Pogrebin and Kelly of leaving out the fact, mentioned in the book, that the alleged victim in the new incident, Tracy Harmon Joyce, apparently does not recall it.

MORE: New Kavanaugh ‘Bombshell’ Leaves Out One Detail: ‘Alleged Victim Denies Any Memory Of It’

Even on the left, a number of commentators questioned why the Times had published Pogrebin and Kelly’s reporting in the Opinion Section, framing it as a narrative about Ramirez as opposed to presenting it as hard news.

Others slammed the Times for a Saturday tweet promoting the article, which suggested “having a penis thrust in your face at a drunken dorm party may seem like harmless fun.” Amid the backlash, The Times deleted the post, saying it had been “poorly phrased.”

However, many critics were left unsatisfied.

The Times did not immediately respond to Pluralist’s request for comment.

Pluralist was not immediately able to obtain a copy of the book, which comes out Tuesday.

Cover image: Brett Kavanaugh. (Screen grab)



Follow Us