On her Thursday afternoon show, MSNBC anchor Andrea Mitchell wailed that Republican voting reform legislation in states across the country was aimed “towards nullifying voting,” as she bitterly complained that Democrats had failed to enact a federal takeover of all elections. Minutes later, current PBS White House correspondent and incoming NBC News reporter Yamiche Alcindor ranted that new electoral GOP laws represented “a slow January 6th.”
“And the ‘what ifs’ are only more likely if they don’t do anything on voting rights because of all of these moves in the states, Kristen, towards nullifying voting,”Mitchell went to White House correspondent Kristen Welker in distress at 12:01 p.m. ET hour. She continued to fearmonger conspiratorially: “Not just suppressing the vote, making it harder to vote, but actually changing the secretaries of state and the officials who would be choosing, you know, who decides the elections, the state elections, we saw what could happen in Georgia, and also the presidential election, the electors.”
Welker promptly agreed with the nasty attack on Republicans: “And you’re right about Georgia, that’s obviously something the Democrats have front in center with some of the toughest laws passed restricting voting in Georgia and making it difficult to vote there.”
After noting that NAACP President Derrick Johnson and “other leaders” like fellow MSNBC host Al Sharpton had called up Democratic senators to lobby for rigging elections at the national level, Mitchell sympathetically declared: “…we heard this passionate appeal from, of course, Senator Warnock….he said, you know, to Rachael Maddow that it was a real moral dilemma for him, to vote for the debt ceiling and do that [filibuster] work around, yet they can’t do it to save the democracy and save minority voting.”
Alcindor responded by channeling radical left-wing activists crying out racism.
I’m hearing from Democratic activists who say they don’t see enough urgency in the Democratic Party for voting rights.They say that this does not only concern voting rights in general. let’s also remember that there are states, including North Carolina, that were accused of targeting African-American voters, in particular, with surgical precision.
A few moments later, the reporter remembered fondly an event at the White House in March where she exhorted the President to stop the Senate filibuster and allow the president to push through his radical agenda. “Because at the beginning of his presidency, I pressed him at his first press conference, saying, why not change the filibuster to at least cut out civil rights issues? And he, at that point, was really against it.”
Alcindor went on to parrot far-left MSNBC host Joy Reid by wildly claiming that reasonable voting reforms passed by Republican-controlled state legislatures were the equivalent of the violent riot at the U.S. Capitol: “We’ve seen so many GOP lawmakers across the country moving to changing the voting laws in this country. It’s something that people say is really a slow January 6th, sort of wiping away and chipping away at the democratic norms in this country.”
This coming from a supposed “journalist” who is demanding Democrats do away with the filibuster in order to shove through legislation that would unconstitutionally federalize state and local elections nationwide. It’s no wonder why NBC was eager to hire Alcindor.
This unhinged discussion was brought to viewers by Applebee’s and Progressive. This is your chance to fight against these advertisers by telling them what you think about their sponsorship of such content.
The December 16th exchange transcript is available here:
12:00 PM ET
(…)
ANDREA MITCHELL: And the “what ifs” are only more likely if they don’t do anything on voting rights because of all of these moves in the states, Kristen, towards nullifying voting. We saw the potential for Georgia to be a country that suppresses voting, makes it more difficult to vote and changes the secretary of state as well as the official who will decide the election results. Kristen, What is the White House saying regarding all of this?
KRISTEN WELKER: And you’re right about Georgia, that’s obviously something the Democrats have front in center with some of the toughest laws passed restricting voting in Georgia and making it difficult to vote there.
In public, the White House strikes a completely different tone from what they do in private. President Biden was asked about this yesterday, he said there’s nothing more important than getting voting rights passed. However, the administration is mumbling something to Garrett privately. [Haake]Was just talking about: How do you convince Joe Manchin to reconsider his position on the issue? And how can this help get Build Back Better approved and on the wider agenda?
The midterms are looming large so the attention will be shifting from politics to policy in the new year. And so I think there’s some concern within the administration that this pivot to voting rights, while it’s obviously one of the President’s key campaign promises, something that he wants to see passed, will it actually happen and could it slow down the process of getting Build Back Better done in the new year?
MITCHELL. Yamiche Alcindor. Yesterday, the NAACP’s Derrick Johnson and other leading leaders called Reverend Al Sharpton. Because they believe – and we heard this passionate appeal from, of course, Senator Warnock the other night – that if you could change it for the debt ceiling, which is important, which he voted for. But he said, you know, to Rachael Maddow that it was a real moral dilemma for him, to vote for the debt ceiling and do that work around, yet they can’t do it to save the democracy and save minority voting.
YAMICHE ALCONDO : This is right, and you can see it here at White House. It is, like Kristen mentioned, a public-facing kind of underlining of how crucial voting rights are. But then, of course, you have officials who are also facing private pressure from civil rights organizations, the NAACP president, others, saying, “Okay, President Biden, if you think voting is the most urgent thing domestically in this country,” which is what he said yesterday, “you should be acting more like it.”
I’m hearing from Democratic activists who say they don’t see enough urgency in the Democratic Party for voting rights. And they say, look, this is not just about sort if voting rights overall, let’s also remember that there are states, including North Carolina, that were accused of targeting African-American voters, in particular, with surgical precision. You can also hear the African-Americans speaking out against the Democratic base. They say that this party needs to be our support and that they need to treat infrastructure as well as all the other issues that President Obama has been vocally advocating.
Problem is, naturally, with Garrett. [Haake]Was referring to. They need to figure out how they can do this. It all comes down to Joe Manchin, Senator Sinema and the fact that they have two senators who are not open to changing filibuster. And I should say that it’s been interesting to watch how President Biden has sort of dealt with this. At the start of his presidency I asked him to change the filibuster so that civil rights issues could be addressed. He was against the idea at that time. He was against the idea.
We’ve now seen sort of a slow shift on the President’s side, sort of hinting at the idea that yes, voting rights can be something that is cut out and that it is a loop[hole]In the filibuster. That’s also of course echoing what Jim Clyburn has been saying for a very long time, the number three of course in the Democratic House, saying we need to at least be able to figure out how to deal with voting rights and civil rights.
But it is a conundrum for this White House, but it’s also a conundrum for the Democrats, who are going to go to the poles asking people to vote for them, but also facing a base that’s looking at them saying, what more could you have done to protect our voting rights?
MITCHELL: And if I’m – if my memory serves, the President’s going to South Carolina for Jim Clyburn tomorrow. And who many people would say owes him the nomination given the turning point that Jim Clyburn’s endorsement was. So he’s clearly going to be hearing from Jim Clyburn tomorrow, Yamiche.
ALCINDOR, He is sure to hear from him. And Jim Clyburn, again, has been saying for months – not weeks, but months – “You need to figure out a loophole, you need to figure out a carve out for civil rights and voting rights.” The President had been hesitant to do that. But Jim Clyburn is really – he is the voice for so many in the Democratic base who are saying this is a Democratic Party that needs to understand that voting rights is the top issue. We’ve seen so many GOP lawmakers across the country moving to changing the voting laws in this country. It’s something that people say is really a slow January 6th, sort of wiping away and chipping away at the democratic norms in this country. So of course when he goes to South Carolina tomorrow, the President, I’m sure is going to be hearing an earful, and I’ve been hearing an earful from Democratic activists who say they want to see more done.
(…)
About Post Author
You may also like
-
The Benefits of Movable Soundproof Room Dividers: Flexibility, Noise Control, and Sustainable Design
-
What to Do Following an Unfair Workers’ Compensation Denial
-
Benefits of Utilizing After School Programs
-
Why Is Extra Security Needed for Events and Meetings?
-
How to Skip the Hassle of PA’s with Orbit AI