Twitter Users Unite, SLAM Twitter ‘Private Information’ Policy Change

Twitter users, which include many conservatives, are criticizing Twitter’s new policy. It could result in the destruction of videos and images that openly mock or critique leftists.

You can say goodbye to independent journalism, which is capable of exposing rioters or the left. Conservatives have condemned Twitter. declaring the platform “will not allow the sharing of private media, such as images or videos of private individuals without their consent.” Human Events Senior Editor Jack PosobiecBy extrapolating: “Under Twitter new ‘private media’ regulations we wouldn’t have been allowed to post screenshots of Darrel Brooks’ Facebook posts,” referring to the anti-white rapper who has been accused of using a Sports Utility Vehicle to mow down civilians at a Christmas parade.

Self-described evolution theorist, podcast host Bret WeinsteinThis suggestion is made the policy update “is an unworkable policy,” while illustrating “it is beautifully constructed to allow Twitter to protect its friends and punish/hobble others with *selective enforcement* all while pretending to be impartial and interested only in the ‘safety’ of the community.”

Conservative radio host Dana LoeschShared a grim theoryAlso:

“This is Twitter trying to muzzle independent journalists. This policy allows only the corporate media to set the narrative about Kenosha. Project Veritas may be shut down. Twitter is also saying they’re no longer a public square. How does that factor into 230 exemptions?”

An unverified account claims to represent Jon Stokes, founder of Ars Technica. similar prediction: “I have a Twitter list I put together during the summer 2020 protests that’s mostly independent media livestreaming and photographing protests. I expect that’s in trouble now and will be far less useful when something else kicks off.”

Commentary Magazine associate editor Noah Rothman suggested that bias could completely replace reality. infest the policy’s enforcement:

“Safe bet this will be enforced selectively depending on the circumstances and the level of protest (and the status of protesters) against discrete episodes of censorship. So, probably not really a standard.”

Federalist responded with a damning article headlined, “Twitter Implements New Rule So It Can Selectively Ban Memes, Mockery Of Democrats,” speculating on the implications of Twitter’s policy change.

For those with any doubts about the fact the policy was made to protect groups that liberals care about above others, Twitter made that clear in its policy page: “The misuse of private media can affect everyone, but can have a disproportionate effect on women, activists, dissidents, and members of minority communities.”

After the departure of then-Twitter CEO, the policy was changed. Jack DorseyHe was replaced by the now-CEO Parag Agrawal. He has beenwho is dogged by rumors of far-left partisanship, such as infamously stating in an interview that “Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment.”

Conservatives are being attacked.Tweet at (415-222-9670 to demand Big Tech follow the First Amendment and provide transparency for conservatives. If you have been censored, contact us using CensorTrack’sContact formHelp us to hold Big Tech responsible.