The Denver Post Goes Into Full Pro-Abortion Lobbyist Mode Following SCOTUS Leak – Opinion

Journalism can be used to promote pro-abortion content.

Leak from the Supreme Court regarding a draft opinion concerning a future ruling that has an impact on the Roe Vs. WadeMany left-leaning people have become unhinged since 1973’s decision. This has exposed the fact that liberal partisans are a large part of the mass media. Numerous members of the media have broadcast unbalanced reactions to the document leak, which exposed their undiluted partisanship.

Many journalists are fine with supporting the potential damage that this situation could cause to the highest court, as I mentioned in my latest Lie Able Sources podcast. Even though they told us days ago about Elon Musk buying Twitter, this is what they do. While they were blaming social media websites for threatening the foundations of our country, now they cheerleader that one branch of government is being attacked.

Denver Post takes things further from ethical journalistic reporting. Conrad Swanson’s rushed column in the Denver Post reveals that this news source is not an impartial source but instead promotes full-on pro-abortion activism. Swanson doesn’t pretend to be an expert on the topic, but takes the time and explains the pros and cons of the procedure. He also offers guidance about how to preserve abortion access.

Its glowing description of how Roe v. Wade will be repealed does not reflect its position. “Colorado law will not make abortion illegal. Lawmakers enshrined that right in state law last month.” The Denver Post is not content to express disappointment at the possible ruling from SCOTUS. They see this as a national negative. Read the entire article for details about the ramifications and how you can address them.

Because of Colorado’s abortion rights, providers in the state are likely to be stretched further by an influx of patients coming from out of state, Bolaños Perea said. The pandemic saw an increase in patients from out of state, and medical professionals were working already to address this.

Although this sounds negative, Conrad is doing something extraordinary as a journalist. He plans to make it even more difficult for abortion providers and will give a tutorial about how women from other states can travel to Colorado to undergo the procedure. The public relations campaign that Planned Parenthood would love to see is a complete disregard for journalism standards.

Throughout the piece, there are quotes from those on only one side of the issue — a pro-abortion activist, a PPFA director, and an abortion doctor are given a full platform to deliver all the needed guidance on getting an abortion in Colorado. This is one side only. There are no other voices on the subject. This is positive promotion. 

The abortion agitprop ends with a guidebook. Swanson offers suggestions for places where outsiders can get financial help to undergo an in-state procedure. A link is then provided to Act Blue, the Democratic Party’s fundraising portal. 

This major paper is in complete pro-abort advocacy mode.
Even better, they provide links to funding abortion through the Democrats. Abdication of all objectivity and journalism. https://t.co/3ovKvqNjo1 pic.twitter.com/nI5KEY011s

— Brad Slager 🍸🥃🍺🎙 Lifetime Subscriber to CNN+ (@MartiniShark) May 4, 2022

If there’s any doubt about the Denver Post’s outward pro-abortion stance, the Denver Post even directs women to avoid the option of an abortion. A link is provided to “Legitimate clinics” where the desired procedure is promised. They are trying to keep women from going to centers where they might receive guidance or offer them alternatives. As the paper acknowledges, this is true. “to avoid ‘crisis pregnancy centers,’ which seek to talk women out of abortions.” 

This article’s brazenness is remarkable. The Denver Post decided that it would continue to promote abortion and wave flags to warn women from being misinformed. This editorial stance is quite stark and shows what the future holds for media.

Gird yourselves, as we are about to become awash in this type of partisan “journalism” as this issue moves forward.