New Vaccine Study Suggests mRNA Vaccines Actually Increase Probability Of Being Infected With Omicron After 90 Days – Opinion

Branch Covidian Cult members were freebasing Omicron, their panic-inducing drug, for the last few months. They have been fed by the fear cartel and their dealers. As they froth at the mouth, demanding that we partake of their mind-altering drug-of-choice, their monotonal chant drones on, demanding we “follow the science” and “trust the scientists” absent a single study supporting their fear, without identifying a single scientist whom we should trust, and, more importantly, why we should trust them. Fauci has become a meme of himself in recent months (and especially over the last seven days), as the claims he’s made regarding the virus and its origins have proven to be anything from laughably ridiculous to dangerously misleading.

Oftentimes, the decree from the cultists to “follow the science” means to only follow the “science” they’ve been fed by people who claim to be the science and not the totality of the science, as we at RedState have pointed out time and time again. The initial CDC Mask Study only found a 1.32% advantage for mask mandates within the range of error. That means mask mandates do not work, or the data suggest that they do, so it is unlikely that these data will support the claim. When I have previously compared the data between states or countries that have mask mandates to states and countries that don’t have those same mandates, it showed that mandates have had no effect in slowing or stopping infections, hospitalizations, and deaths. The cultists keep on chanting, claiming that the questioning has caused them to continue their lies. TheirThey are conspiracy theorists who are selling dangerous misinformation.

Omicron’s initial spread was my concern. I quickly analyzed the South African data because it was easier to see if our government had fudged that data before I could. Omicron, while more transmittable than any other variants of the virus, was far less deadly and severe than those variants like Delta. Nearly a month ago (November 29th), I stated that the data coming out of South Africa provided “factual rejections of [the] COVID vaccine effectiveness narrative,” as the majority of early cases were found in the vaccinated despite the fact those same people represent a minority of the population.

Omicron cases in South Africa were almost all found among fully-vaccinated individuals, even though only 23.8% had been vaccinated. Although this data suggests that Omicron is more common in vaccinated persons than in unvaccinated individuals, it’s still early and there could be changes to the data. However, it was obvious that South Africa was experiencing an increase in Omicron transmission.

On December 13, I addressed the myth Omicron would make the US worse by updating the data from South Africa. This time, the data was more convincing that Omicron wasn’t as serious as some fear-nibarbital-consuming cultists believe. South Africa had an astonishing 1100% rise in the number of cases. However, there was only 8.32% more deaths. Again, at the time, South Africa’s vaccination rate was below 25%. The United States has more than twice as many cases and five times the COVID death rate than South Africa. These data suggest that Omicron infection is much more prevalent in those who are vaccinated as opposed to those who aren’t.

Although I was hesitant to make such bold claims, I decided not to do so as I worried about the negative reaction of social media fact-checkers who might ban or label the link as misinformation.  It wouldn’t be the first time a vaccine has made the situation worse either, as admitted by Anthony Fauci early in the pandemic. Fauci stated, as I reported on December 15, during a Facebook Live with Mark Zuckerberg event in March 2020, that vaccine development should include the possibility that vaccines can make people sicker. While I had my suspicions that the vaccine may actually make you More likely to be infected with Omicron than being unvaccinated, I was careful to make sure that I made clear I wasn’t specifically stating that.

“Yet, while I claim that the vaccine lacks the efficacy they suggest it has, I have never said that the vaccines could make it more likely that you’re infected with COVID-19.”

Fauci went on to state that vaccines which he supervised the development of, “actually made individuals more likely to get infected.”

New data suggests that Omicron vaccines have negative efficacy. That is what Fauci had warned about as a possibility. There are higher chances of getting infected if one has not been vaccinated for at least 90 days. The study, entitled “Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variants following a two-dose or booster BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination series: A Danish cohort study,” shows that both mRNA vaccines maintained a better than 50% effectiveness against previous variants of COVID-19, that effectiveness drops to nearly zero 60 days after the vaccine is administered and actually provides a negative response after 90 days. The initial Omicron vaccine effectiveness was lower than that against Delta, even though both vaccines were tested. This is despite the fact that Delta’s efficacy had been higher for more than 90 days.

After adjusting for the confidence interval both vaccines are susceptible to causing adverse effects within 30 days. Data show that the Pfizer vaccine only has data that show positive effects for the first 30-days. Moderna’s vaccine consistently shows the potential of cause in negative results, that is, a higher likelihood of infection, from the date of vaccination forward.

This data confirms what we have known all along: Omicron vaccines do not provide protection and may increase the likelihood of you being infected.  While vaccine boosters might reduce this risk for a few days, the boost would last only thirty days and then the chance of getting infected again would increase to the same level as the non-vaccinated. or higher.

I am sure that we won’t hear about This study in the mainstream media, and the Biden Administration won’t be using thisTheir policy decisions can be shaped by science.