For months, I, and a few others across media, have been saying that the COVID data doesn’t match the hype. Despite claims by the CDC that vaccines protect against every COVID-19 variant including Omicron, data on vaccines, and an ever-growing list of variants, shows that they aren’t as effective as advertised. This discrepancy has been challenged by citizens from all over the globe, who often get a brutal response from their governments.
There was a huge protest today in Germany against lockdowns and COVID restrictions. pic.twitter.com/37c2fuOxZh
— Aaron Ginn (@aginnt) December 12, 2021
#GermanyFor measuring distances between individuals, officers in police use folding rulers. Nine #policeAn 80-year-old woman was harassed by officers Officers harassed an 80-year-old woman because she failed to display her ID #vaccinationpass. Many residents were sent to unknown places after anti-racist protests.#Covid #protest. #Policeviolence pic.twitter.com/DEdTNOs22z
— 🅽🅴🆆🆂🅵🅻🅰🆂🅷 🆃🅵 (@newsflash_TF) December 13, 2021
As the evidence of vaccine ineffectiveness Please begins to mount, the government, big pharma, and the media continue their assault on truth and facts, stating that data presented that shows that vaccines are not as effective as they suggest, is taken out of context or isn’t comprehensive enough. Instead of publishing the complete data, or perhaps showing those “incomplete” portrayals where they are lacking, the CDC and other agencies continue to just tell us to “follow the science,” or even in the case of Anthony Fauci, claim to beThe science.
When Omicron made its debut in Southern Africa, the science community was quick to blame South Africa’s low vaccination rate, calling this “the variant of the unvaccinated.” Yet, when you look at the data it again disagrees with that assertion, as shown in this piece written on November 29th by yours truly. The updated data shows that South Africa, which has a 23.8 per cent vaccination rate, saw a 1,100% increase in the number of cases within the past two weeks. Now, should Omicron, the strain primarily responsible for the rise in cases, be “more deadly” than previous strains, there should have been a greater rise in the death rate, or in other words, an over 1,100 percent rise in deaths in that country. That isn’t the case, as COVID deaths in the country have had just an 8.63 percent rise over the last two weeks. Portugal, which has an 88.1 percent vaccine rate, saw a 46 percent rise of COVID cases and a 50.63% increase in the number of COVID victims. France had almost 70 percent of its population fully vaccinated. However, they have seen a 92 per cent increase in the number of cases and 100.9 percent more deaths. It is clear that vaccines do not contribute to new cases or death rates. South Africa’s large caseload likely is as a result of South Africa having dodged previous spikes in COVID numbers around the globe, however, with the significantly decreased severity of Omicron cases, they may have just lucked out again.
South Africa’s first cases of Omicron allegedly came from Botswana, however, each of the earliest identified cases was in people who were, again, fully vaccinated.
Sky News also had an article on November 30th, which shatters the “variant of the unvaccinated” narrative. Two Hong Kong-based travelers traveled from Hong Kong to South Africa and returned to Hong Kong on November 12. Two passengers from Hong Kong were required to adhere to strict rules for travel, such as being completely vaccinated, wearing a mask throughout the journey, taking part in testing upon arrival, returning testing, and following a quarantine after their return. They both completed all four requirements without difficulty, but despite being double-negative and wearing masks, both were able to pass the mandatory 21-day quarantine. The vaccines didn’t stop it. The masks didn’t stop it. The testing didn’t catch it. Omicron is more easily transmissible than Omicron. However, despite the mountain of data supporting this claim, all governments around the world continue to recommend that you get fully vaccinated.
Reuters released some alarming information about December 10th that clearly breaks the narrative.
“The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said that of the 43 cases attributed to Omicron variant, 34 people had been fully vaccinated. Fourteen of them had also received a booster, although five of those cases occurred less than 14 days after the additional shot before full protection kicks in.”
The narrative is completely distorted here. If Omicron vaccine were effective, data would reveal that Omicron cases are less common in people who have had their shots. This shows that almost 60% of all cases have been identified in people who were not fully vaccinated. While the vaccine does not make Omicron more common, this case suggests that they are no longer effective against it. 32 percent had been identified as having received boosters, despite the fact that only 16 percent of total people have received them. Even when you exclude cases that the booster did not reach its maximum effectiveness, 26% of all cases stemmed from people who had been fully vaccinated. This is even though they only make up 16% of the total population. The caseload should be almost identical to that of the unvaccinated if you are equally susceptible to Omicron infection, regardless of your vaccination status. It doesn’t.
Which brings me back to the point I have been consistently making: Why can government mandate something which doesn’t carry the benefits which it suggests it does? Although I am not against mandating that someone be given any substance they do not want in their body, it would be easier to sell people the idea if there was more benefit, less dangerous side effects, longer lifespan, or natural immunity from COVID-19. This is a violation of our rights.
The matter is not being discussed by the government, the big pharma companies, or the media. But here we are.
This post was last modified on December 13, 2021 11:35 pm
This website uses cookies.