Alec Baldwin Makes Stunning Claim About the Shooting on ‘Rust’ Movie Set – Opinion

Alec Baldwin has done an interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos about the shooting on the “Rust” movie set.

The full interview is set to run tomorrow, but some clips are already indicating some of what Baldwin will say, and it’s not going over well with the public.

Baldwin claims that he “didn’t pull the trigger” in the October shooting that killed the cinematographer, Halyna Hutchins, and wounded the director Joel Souza.

EXCLUSIVE – “The trigger was not pulled.” Alec Baldwin says that the trigger was not pulled. @GStephanopoulosIn his first interview since the fatal shooting of Rust on-set.

You can watch TOMORROW, 8 pm ET @ABCStream later @Hulu. https://t.co/u7L88vylra pic.twitter.com/bJsssJoAJq

— ABC News (@ABC) December 1, 2021

From the Post Millennial

In the interview, Stephanopolous asked “You haven’t said much in public since that tragic accident? Why are you speaking out? You must be asking yourself 1000 questions to answer the question “How could this have happened?” You’ve described it as a one 2 trillion shot, and the gun was in your hand. That’s a difficult thing to accept. It wasn’t in the script for the trigger pull.”

“Well, the trigger wasn’t pulled,” Baldwin said, “I didn’t pull the trigger.”
“So you never pulled the trigger?” Stephanopolous asked.

“No, no,” Baldwin said. “I would never point a gun and pull that trigger at them. Never.”
“What did you think? How did a real bullet get on the set?” Stephanopolous asked.

“I have no idea. A live bullet was accidentally put in a gun. A bullet that wasn’t even supposed to be on the property,” Baldwin said.

We’ll have to see what else he says tomorrow, but it seems to me this is a very bad move.

Let’s start with the legal problems here. I don’t know what Baldwin was told by his attorney. At the very least, Baldwin will be facing a ton civil lawsuits. Why does he talk to Stephanopoulos at all?

It is a dangerous thing to advise others not to do. As we reported, Baldwin already gave a prior statement on the road to reporters that he’s now locked into. Baldwin’s lawyer will likely be furious at this latest action.

As to the substance of his claim that he “didn’t pull the trigger,” there is the conflicting statement of Mamie Mitchell. Mitchell is the film’s script supervisor and Baldwin has already been sued. Mitchell was a witness, and she claims that Baldwin intentionally fired the gun, even though the script didn’t call for it being fired.

NY Post

In the suit, Mitchell claimed, “Alec Baldwin intentionally, without just cause or excuse, cocked and fired and [sic] loaded gun even though the upcoming scene to be filmed did not call for the cocking and firing of a firearm.”

She also said every safety protocol designed to ensure safety with a firearm on set was ignored, such as the presence of live ammunition on set, and that “actions that were taken” that day “were against all industry norms.” [….]

“I saw Alec going through his movement with the gun for the camera,” said Mamie Mitchell, the script supervisor on set who called 911 when Baldwin shot and killed Hutchins and injured director Joel Souza on Oct. 21.

“I was holding my script in my left hand and had taken out my iPhone and opened up my photos to check the continuity on his shirt and vest.,” she said. “Then an explosion. Deafening loud gunshot.”

Now we will note that there was a prior report of accidental discharges on the set that involved Baldwin’s body double. But that doesn’t necessarily help Baldwin.

This is the conclusion of the report

Baldwin’s stunt double accidentally fired two rounds Saturday after being told that the gun was “cold” — lingo for a weapon that doesn’t have any ammunition, including blanks — two crew members who witnessed the episode told the Los Angeles Times.

“There should have been an investigation into what happened,” a crew member said. “There were no safety meetings. There was no assurance that it wouldn’t happen again. All they wanted to do was rush, rush, rush.”

One of his colleagues was so worried about the misfires in the prop guns that he texted the unit production manager. “We’ve now had 3 accidental discharges. This is super unsafe,” according to a copy of the message reviewed by The Times.

I don’t trust Baldwin as far as I can throw him. If he believed he could convince people with his claim, it isn’t going down well. People aren’t buying it.

I’m not going to comment on the question of how the gun could accidentally fire, I’ll leave that to another article by my colleague Dennis Santiago, who will delve into that question.

But the problem is even if that were true — if there was an accidental discharge — Baldwin may have had notice of it or should have had notice of it from the prior accidental discharges. Again, Baldwin wasn’t just an actor on the production; he was also a producer.

However, even if he were right, he could still get on the hook. He should have asked the question but didn’t. His efforts to free himself from the trap may have failed him. He should also have taken the time to check his gun and not let anyone else see it.